building in voice ai, for low resource languages, here to get feedback and grow with the community
👋 Hi Product Hunt!
I’m Nitesh (Bhudev), co-founder of Vaani Research Labs, building voice AI from Bengaluru, India.
A question has followed me since my IISc days in 2017, when we ran experiments on borrowed supercomputer time: why does AI speech sound so un-human?
Our answer: humanness isn’t a filter you add to speech. Imperfection is what makes a voice feel real, so it has to be built into the model itself. That belief became Vaani.
Before this, I spent years as a Staff Data Scientist at Hypersonix, working on forecasting engines and inventory simulations. Then I moved from predicting numbers to modelling speech.
What we’ve built in year one:
🎙️ A natively multilingual speech foundation model (code-mix included)
⚙️ 148,000 lines of C++ orchestration for ultra-low latency
📦 50 TB of hand-curated low-resource language data
🏦 Production voice agents for banks, lenders and insurers
Off-duty, I play the flute and run after two kids. 🎶
I’d love your take:
1️⃣ What’s the biggest gap in voice AI today: accents, latency, cost, or trust?
2️⃣ Which language or dialect should voice AI get right next?
3️⃣ Developers, researchers, enterprises: what would make you try a new speech stack?
Open to feedback, blogs, products and partnerships. 🙏
vaaniresearch.com
Replies
Welcome Nitesh! On 1, from the voice notes side I'd say trust, and it lives in the small stuff: a transcript can be 95% right and still lose the user on one wrong name or number. Code-mix is the other half. Italians drop English words mid sentence all the time ("ho la call col team marketing alle tre"), and many stacks either translate them or mangle them, so having code-mix in the foundation model rather than bolted on is the right call. On 2: Italian dialects. Neapolitan or Sicilian speech is still hard for most speech models.