Entellispace - Every team always aligned
byβ’
Entellispace reads your meeting transcripts and surfaces what actually matters β the decisions made, the tensions left unresolved, and the one blocker holding up everything downstream. Built for product managers drowning in meetings, it turns every conversation into clear next moves instead of notes nobody reads. Paste a transcript or record live; get back what was decided, who's waiting on what, and the friction that needs your attention.
Replies
Pasted a messy 45 minute transcript from a planning call and it pulled out the unresolved API dependency plus two clear decisions in under a minute. Honestly didn't expect the tension callouts to be that on point.
@tahayankulΒ This means a lot β thank you for actually running a real transcript through it, that's the feedback I care about most.
The tension callouts being the surprising part is exactly what I'm going for. Most tools capture what was decided; the harder and more useful thing is catching what didn't resolve and who's still misaligned. Glad it landed on a messy one.
If you keep using it, I'd love to know where it misses β the transcripts where it gets a tension wrong or flattens something are the ones that'll make it sharper. And if it's genuinely useful, I'm onboarding early teams now.
How does it handle really messy transcripts where people talk over each other and there are no clear action statements β does it just guess at the decisions or flag the ambiguity back to you?
@zgr1543136Β Great question β honestly the case I care about most, because it's where most tools quietly bullshit you.
Short version: it doesn't force clarity that isn't there. Every decision it pulls carries a confidence signal, so a hedged "maybe we go with X" surfaces differently from a firm call. And when people talk over each other and nothing resolves, that's usually a real tension, not noise β so instead of guessing at a decision, it flags "this didn't resolve, here's who was on each side" and hands the ambiguity back to you rather than inventing a clean answer.
Taha's comment below is actually a good example β messy 45-min call, and the useful output was the unresolved dependency, not a forced decision.
Still hardening it on truly chaotic multi-speaker audio though. If you've got a transcript that you think would break it, I'd genuinely love to run it β that's exactly the edge I want to test against.
Curious how it handles messy transcripts with multiple threads going at once, does it still pull out the right decisions or does it get confused when people talk over each other?
Great question, Abdulkadir β this is the case I care about most, because messy multi-thread meetings are exactly where decisions get lost, and it's where a lot of tools quietly make things up.
Short version: it actually holds up better on messy transcripts than clean ones, because the mess is usually the signal. When threads tangle and people talk over each other, that's often where the real tension or the unresolved decision lives. So instead of forcing one tidy narrative, it separates them: here's what got decided, here's what's still open, here's the thread that never resolved.
And it won't fake certainty. Each decision carries a confidence signal, so a firm "we're doing X" reads differently from a hedged "maybe, let's revisit." When something's genuinely ambiguous, it flags it as unresolved and hands it back to you rather than inventing a decision that wasn't really made.
Someone earlier in the comments ran a messy 45-min planning call through it and said the tension call-outs were the surprising part β that's this exact case in action.
Still hardening it on truly chaotic audio, so if you've got a transcript you think would break it, I'd love to run it β that's the edge I most want to pressure-test.