What’s the most frustrating part of fixing issues after a website audit?

Most website audit tools can identify technical issues, but knowing what to fix first and how to implement the changes can be the harder part.

While building ClarityCrawl, I've been exploring how to make website diagnostics more actionable through clear explanations, prioritized findings, and reviewable fix recommendations.

I'm curious about your experience:

1. Too many findings without clear priorities?

2. Technical recommendations that are difficult to understand?

3. Knowing the problem but not how to fix it?

4. Difficulty verifying whether a fix actually worked?

What's the one thing you'd improve about website audit tools?

I'd love to hear your thoughts, especially from developers, SEO professionals, and website owners.