ArguFight - Argue. Win. Prove it. — The esports of debate, judged by AI

Tired of arguments with no winner? ArguFight is the esports of debate. 3 AI judges score every round on logic, evidence, and rhetoric — verdicts in seconds. Climb the ELO ladder, earn championship belts across 6 categories, defend titles, and finally prove who's right. No flame wars. No echo chambers. No 1,200-tweet threads going nowhere. Built in 26 languages. Free on web, iOS, and Android. Argue smarter, not louder.

Hey Product Hunt 👋 I'm Alain, founder of ArguFight. I built this because online "debate" usually comes down to who can outshout the other person, or who has the bigger follower count. The actual argument — the logic, the evidence, the rhetoric — never gets evaluated on its own terms. So we built a platform where AI judges score every debate round on three axes: logic, evidence, and rhetoric. Win the score, win the round. Once you start winning, you climb an ELO ladder. The top debaters in each category hold a "championship belt" that other players can challenge for. Structured argument, with the social fabric of a fight game. What's working so far: • AI judging across multiple models (DeepSeek primary, Wikipedia context, optional Gemini/Groq second opinions) • Real-time debates with structured rounds — no flame wars • Cross-platform: web, iOS, Android — all free • Voice arguments on mobile (Whisper transcription) • Live ELO updates and a championship belt system What I'd love feedback on: 1. Topic discovery — should we lean more on AI-generated topics, or community-submitted ones? 2. Belt mechanics — does the championship belt system feel motivating, or grindy? 3. Judge transparency — every verdict shows the AI judge's reasoning. Is that enough for you to trust it? Try a debate and tell me where the seams show. Drop your username and I'll challenge you 🥋

ArguFight - Argue. Win. Prove it. — The esports of debate, judged by AI

Replies