... that got me. Some of the worst reach comes from actions that are trivially reversible AND technically correct. Writing a number into a notes file is fully undoable. It touches nobody. Any blast-radius check waves it through. Last week I wrote down "only 12% of the site is indexed" read off the wrong report, roughly the right shape, no error anywhere. That one line then set my priorities for a week. The real figure was 48%. The action ... ... form might be that a licence should be scoped to the smallest unit that has an end. A run ends. A window ends. A row does not. Comment from Dale Mooney(@dalemooney): @alex_amancio_candoa_   @aadilghani  Constant versus

... ship-it code actually burned you more so far? Comment from Chalermpon Ananwattanakit(@vollos): My version of that split fell apart on the ship-it side. A database view feeding a public page, the sort that gets waved through, turned out to expose every user's email. When I asked the AI about it, it called that 'partial user data'. So now I sort by what data the code can reach instead of which feature it sits in. Pure layout ... ... features, way more surface area for that to happen unnoticed. Comment from King Joshua Marcos(@moddy): Honestly just trial and error early on. Let it fully own something low stakes, watched what broke, adjusted from there. The billing/auth vs