What would you prefer on social media: AI-generated images or real ones?

Real ones, always.

I’m fascinated with AI generated art but hands down real images.

I personally will not go with AI generated images

Both are fine as long as they are pleasing to the eye. Though, I would still prefer the real ones for the sake of future datasets to be used in training new AI models. If we just flood the Internet with AI-generated content, we won't be having the new Stable Diffusion moment.

Definitely real images, I understand AI generated images are fascinating and really take us wherever the mind can wander, but something so relatable about real images right?

Depends on the quality, intent and audience. There's no single strategy. But people do value authenticity and things that can't be replicated, so it's fundamentally harder to that with AI-generated socials.

As a product visionary, I believe both AI-generated and real images have their own unique advantages on social media. AI-generated photos allow users to express themselves more creatively and imaginatively, while real images and videos can capture authentic moments and emotions. That being said, AI-generated content will not wholly replace real photos and videos in the future. People will continue to take real photos and videos of themselves and their surroundings because they provide a personal touch and a way to share their unique experiences with others. Additionally, some social media platforms prioritize real and original content over AI-generated content.

Definitely real one..

I prefer to avoid social media at all. As for people in general, AI wins.

My personal preference would depend on the specific project and its objectives. But I tend to lean towards real images

Does it matter tbh? If the image is relevant to the content you're sharing and appealing to the user, perhaps this question becomes moot? Just thinking out loud...

I think we are at the point that it is very hard to distinguish the real images from the AI generated ones

Having used Dall E, Stability AI, Midjourney and the likes for a few months now, my guess is that we probably may not even be able to tell the difference between AI generated and real ones by next year :)

Thank you to everyone who shared their thoughts on this topic. I'm asking because I recently received feedback on my product stating that people will soon cease taking photos of themselves, opting instead to generate images. The argument posits that "there's no point in creating such a service". My global vision is as follows: as a micro-influencer, I can confidently assert that trust and audience loyalty are invaluable assets. If it becomes known that a beloved brand or influencer is presenting a generated photo as genuine, they stand to lose that trust. Moreover, if they openly publish generated images, it will eventually become "not a big deal" and won't elicit enthusiasm from the audience because "everyone does it." People value originality. I'm not sure if comparing fake Chanel bags to genuine ones is entirely apt, but hypothetically, people continue to buy and are willing to pay a significant sum for the authentic Chanel. The crucial aspect is knowing it's genuine. I am confident that users will find ways to verify the originality of their content, and such content will be highly valued P.S. Based on your answers you would prefer original content :)

Personally, I still like real images better, but I guess AI-generated images have their place, especially when it comes to making animations look cool!

Yeah, there are so many good generative AI image tools like Midjourney, but I still prefer real images.