I've been thinking about this more and more lately. Are we all still building in public?
In this era where AI is giving anyone the ability to replicate your company quite quickly, it seems like building in public probably brings more problems than benefits, especially early on. I've seen quite a few people complain about this, even those with large accounts that rely on building in public for distribution. Would love to get your thoughts. It's honestly the first time I'm holding a lot more of my cards closer to my chest.
Every day, after launching, makers are contacted on LinkedIn and X by people offering to sell votes. As the Product Hunt team, we are very much aware of this and really hate it. We have systems in place to neutralize this type of gaming. Every vote counts for a different number of points on Product Hunt. A couple examples:
An account with a recently created gmail address and no history of quality contributions on Product Hunt: this vote will count for 0 points. Yes, this might be a well intentioned user, but we take a conservative approach to protect the community. If the account has a company email or applies for verification on Product Hunt, that's a different story.
An account with a company email address linked to a legitimate LinkedIn account with a history of meaningful contributions on Product Hunt: this vote carries significant weight.
A couple questions for the community:
Are there specific accounts on Product Hunt that you suspect participate in vote selling? You can reply here or email report@producthunt.co
What would you want to see us do differently here?