Maklyen May

The feedback black hole in creative projects...
You leave a comment.
Someone makes changes.
A new version appears.
A few weeks later, nobody remembers why that decision was made.
For creative teams, reviewing is not just about adding comments - it s about preserving the thinking behind the work.
Curious:
How and where does your team review images, videos, or creative assets today?
And the bigger question:
Does your review history stay connected to the project?

Two months ago I asked here how people stay aware of what their agents are doing, and @getosmo replied with something that has been quietly rearranging my roadmap since.

I had been treating "can you undo it" as the line for when an agent should stop and ask. He took that apart. Irreversibility over-fires and under-fires, he said. It over-fires on things that cannot be undone but that nobody cares about, like the agent writing a log line. It under-fires on the ones that really hurt: a mass email to 50k users, or a migration you can only roll back after downtime. "Reversible on paper, ruinous in practice."

One of the biggest risks with AI analytics is not when the system says, I don t know.

It is when it gives a confident, polished answer based on the wrong source.

A company may have dozens of tables that could technically answer a question, but only one reflects the definition the business actually trusts.

How are teams helping AI distinguish between data that is available and data that is actually correct for the question?