Lily Jeon

Let s be real: If you ask a standard LLM about your "revolutionary" idea, it will tell you exactly what you want to hear. It s programmed to be polite, not to be a co-founder. Betting your life savings on a "confident hallucination" is just gambling with extra steps.

We built Bunzee.ai (and Business GPT) because we were tired of "vibes-based" building. Instead of just chatting, we plugged in 200,000+ objective data points to act as a Stress-Test Machine for your brain.

Hi PH! I ve spent the last decade obsessing over bento grids and micro-interactions. But recently, I had a bit of an identity crisis. I realized I was spending 4 hours color-grading a button for a product that might not even have a single user.

As a designer-founder, the hardest part isn't the code or the pixels it's the silence after you launch something nobody asked for. I m now on a mission to stop being a "Visionary" and start being a "Data Detective." I'm forcing myself to look at cold, hard spreadsheets before I even open Figma. It s painful, it s not "pretty," but it s the only way I ve found to keep my sanity in this AI-saturated market.

Today, I read a study showing that social media use is linked to weaker reading, vocabulary, and word-recognition skills in teens under 16.
Yesterday, I read an article saying that students who used AI showed up to 55% less brain activity and remembered less.
According to the news, if this is what technology was supposed to help us with and make our lives easier, then I don t see the future very brightly.

On the contrary, I have to say that I use AI for education (e.g. for building, explaining things when I do not understand them). But 80% of people just take the information and do not bother to think about other things.
Yes, we can save a lot of time, and mental capacity/energy with "no memorising" but do we really spend that saved time on something useful and meaningful?