Hey Product Hunt! Rezgar from the video here.👋

After heaps of experimenting and benchmarking, I'm excited to bring you WikiFix! Big thanks to @fmerian and @oobydrnk for getting this launch off the ground!

If you've ever handled an incident with a broken runbook, failed audit due to stale compliance docs, or onboarded someone with outdated guides, you may appreciate a way to keep those docs clean and consistent without frequent manual reviews.

WikiFix monitors your spaces for issues - in v1 it's contradicting claims, duplicate and orphan docs. It asks you which answer is right, and writes a fix. You approve every edit and undo it in one click.

That's v1, which only looks inside Confluence. Next could be checking docs against code, configs, or Notion - we'll work out what matters most together.

Before launch I scanned a few publilc spaces (https://wikifix.ai/examples/). Even carefully maintained public docs from brilliant teams are not immune - NASA (57 conflictcts across 732 docs), GitLab (332 in 4,576), Sourcegraph (86 in 901), Kafka (168 in 1629)... E.g. Europa Clipper's electronics vault is made of: aluminum-zinc alloy or titanium/aluminum? 🛰️

Got a space you'd bet is fully consistent? Make it your first scan. If WikiFix finds nothing useful there, tell me, and get your credits back twice over.

I'm around all day. Ask me anything!

FAQ:

It's AI, so some findings are wrong: about 1 in 5 when we hand-checked them, depending on the wiki. WikiFix has a feedback button, and that's what we tune on.
Rovo (or any AI assistant for that matter) can help with targeted pages and problems, but not in spotting issues across the board. They start from your question and fetch the few pages likely to answer it. While finding contradictions starts from no question and puts every claim next to every other claim on the same topic or relevant code.
WikiFix starts out as a Confluence app but will go standalone in v2. Tell us if you want your KB platform supported.