Warp

The platform for coding agents, locally and in the cloud.

4.8•69 reviews•

2.7K followers

The platform for coding agents, locally and in the cloud.

4.8•69 reviews•

2.7K followers

•

•

The best terminal for building with agents + Oz, the orchestration platform for cloud agents

The Best Warp Alternatives

The best Warp alternatives are Claude Code, Zed, Devin by Cognition, APX Terminal, and SessionCast.

Claude Code

5.0 ·

Choose Claude Code if...

✓you need deep-context coding for large codebases
✓you want a terminal-first agent that edits and tests
✓you prefer Claude’s agent behavior over UI tooling

See details ↓

Zed

4.9 ·

Choose Zed if...

✓you want real-time multiplayer coding with presence
✓you want an AI code editor, not terminal
✓you care most about speed and low-latency editing

See details ↓

Devin by Cognition

5.0 ·

Choose Devin by Cognition if...

✓you want end-to-end task execution with minimal input
✓you need autonomous PRs across complex repos
✓you’re optimizing for delegation over interactivity

See details ↓

APX Terminal

Choose APX Terminal if...

✓you need a secure SSH client with key vault
✓you want local-first data and auditable logs
✓you manage many tunnels and host profiles daily

See details ↓

SessionCast

Choose SessionCast if...

✓you need Claude Code on your phone via browser
✓you want remote access without VPN or SSH
✓you run many tmux sessions and monitor them remotely

See details ↓

What to Consider

Warp has become a standout for developers who want a modern, block-based terminal that pairs everyday CLI work with AI agents, workflows, and sharing. But the alternatives landscape is broader than “another terminal”: some tools go deeper on pure coding-agent capability (Claude Code), others focus on a high-performance editor with built-in AI and real-time collaboration (Zed), while more autonomous “AI engineer” products (Devin) aim to run end-to-end tasks. There are also options that win on security-minded SSH and local-first control (APX Terminal) or on being able to keep a local agent session accessible from anywhere without heavy remote setup (SessionCast).

In evaluating Warp alternatives, we weighed how well each option fits real workflows: depth of coding/agent execution, speed and ergonomics in day-to-day use, collaboration and session management, integration with existing environments (terminal/IDE/SSH/remote), and practical tradeoffs like privacy posture and cost (free tiers vs paid). We also prioritized products with concrete user feedback and clear differentiation, since “agentic” can mean very different things depending on whether you’re shipping code, operating infrastructure, or just trying to stay productive from any device.

Claude Code

Anthropic’s deep-context AI coder

5.0 · 198 reviews

Learn more →

If your priority is raw coding-agent capability in a terminal workflow, Claude Code is the cleanest “agent-first” alternative to Warp. It’s built to ingest large amounts of code context and then search, edit, run tests, and iterate without needing a terminal UI overhaul.

Where Warp shines as an agentic environment, Claude Code shines as the agent itself—especially when you want deep, multi-file changes and you’re comfortable driving everything from the CLI. Users describe it as strong across everything from MVP builds to complex, layered applications when given solid context and engineering guardrails, consistently producing high-quality output suitable for real delivery work across complex applications.

The trade-off is that you’ll bring more of your own environment and workflow plumbing: you don’t get Warp’s block UI, terminal UX, or emerging “ADE” panels by default. Even enthusiastic Claude Code users point to the opportunity for richer ADE-style workflows and tighter environment integration as the next step deeper scalability toward a full agentic development environment.

Best for

Best for developers who want a deep-context coding agent in a pure CLI workflow.

Standout features

✓Deep-context code understanding
✓Terminal-driven search, edits, and runs
✓Git-aware workflows for commits and changes
✓Strong multi-file refactor capability

Zed

The Fastest AI Code Editor

4.9 · 34 reviews

Learn more →

A fast, collaborative code editor is a different bet than an AI-native terminal, and Zed leans hard into that advantage. Instead of centering the terminal as the primary interface, it focuses on low-latency editing, in-editor AI assistance, and human collaboration.

Zed is the better alternative when your day is mostly spent inside an editor and you want AI help where you write and review code, not where you run commands. Its multiplayer features are a core differentiator: you can work live with other Zed users, and agent-assisted editing can participate in that shared session so collaboration with AI feels native real-time collaboration with other Zed users.

Compared with Warp, you’re trading terminal-first workflows and block-based command history for an editor-first environment with performance and collaboration as the headline. If you’re already pairing regularly or doing team debugging sessions, Zed’s direction can reduce tool switching and keep everyone in the same place.

Best for

Ideal for teams and pairs who want a high-performance editor with built-in collaboration and AI.

Standout features

✓Real-time multiplayer editing
✓Low-latency, GPU-accelerated editor
✓Built-in AI-assisted editing
✓Remote development support (SSH/containers)

Devin by Cognition

The first AI software engineer

5.0 · 3 reviews

Learn more →

Devin is the alternative to pick when you’re trying to delegate an entire engineering task, not co-pilot each step. While Warp is evolving into an agentic development environment you actively steer, Devin is positioned as an autonomous “AI software engineer” that can plan and execute multi-step work across tools.

The big difference is interaction model: Devin aims to take a ticket-like prompt and drive toward a finished outcome, which can be a better fit for maintenance queues, migrations, or repetitive internal tooling. That autonomy is the point—especially when you want the agent to operate across browser, repo, and execution contexts without you living in the terminal.

The trade-off versus Warp is less emphasis on terminal UX and more reliance on the agent’s end-to-end execution quality and observability patterns. If you want a hands-on loop with tight command approval, terminal ergonomics, and an integrated review surface, Warp may feel more controllable; if you want delegation, Devin is the more direct path.

Best for

Best for teams that want an autonomous agent to execute end-to-end engineering tasks.

Standout features

✓Autonomous task execution across tools
✓Works across large, complex codebases
✓PR-oriented workflow for changes
✓Integrations via tool connectors (MCP)

APX Terminal

Encrypted terminal and SSH client with built‑in AI assistant

Learn more →

APX Terminal is a strong Warp alternative when your terminal work is really “SSH work.” It emphasizes secure credential handling, repeatable remote host setups, and an ops-friendly UI for connecting, forwarding ports, and auditing what happened.

Compared with Warp’s developer-centric terminal blocks and agent workflow, APX focuses on infrastructure realities: many hosts, many tunnels, and many secrets. One practical differentiator is how it treats complex port forwarding as a saved configuration you can toggle, turning long commands into a reusable host profile toggle that entire complex mapping group on or off.

It also leans local-first for ownership and migration. Instead of locking data behind an account, APX can be moved by copying its local data directory so your keys, history, and configs come with you copying your data directory.

If you mainly want AI inside a modern terminal UI, Warp will feel more “dev environment.” If you need a serious SSH client with security and repeatability at the center, APX is the sharper tool.

Best for

Ideal for DevOps and security-conscious users managing servers over SSH daily.

Standout features

✓Local encrypted key vault
✓Saved tunnel rules and host profiles
✓SSH-first workflows with auditing
✓Cross-platform terminal and SSH client

SessionCast

CLI control to monitor and work with Claude Code remotely

Learn more →

SessionCast is purpose-built for one problem Warp doesn’t fully solve yet: controlling your existing local CLI agent sessions from anywhere. Instead of replacing your terminal, it lets you keep Claude Code (or other tmux-driven workflows) running on your own machine and access them through a browser.

The core appeal is avoiding remote-access ceremony. Its workflow is intentionally “run the agent, open a browser,” skipping the usual VPN, SSH configuration, and port-forwarding setup No VPN. No SSH port opening.

It’s also designed for parallelism if you run multiple agents at once. The agent can auto-detect all tmux sessions and present them in a dashboard so you can switch, monitor, and send input to each session without juggling connections automatically detects all tmux sessions.

If you want a unified, local terminal UX with integrated AI, Warp remains the all-in-one path. If you want mobile-friendly, browser-based remote continuity for what’s already running on your dev box, SessionCast is the more direct fit.