A few years ago I gave online feeds another chance and realised, to my horror, that I couldn't trust any of them. The big ones just want your attention and will do anything to keep it. The cosy chronological ones are mostly noise. Either way, finding out what's actually going on in the world meant wading through junk. Everyone says that's just human nature - ragebait is baked in, nothing to be done. I never bought it. Wikipedia exists: people reach consensus there even on ugly, controversial stuff. So why not a feed? So Veridonia rewards consensus and signal instead of engagement. Every post goes through voting where you're asked not "do you like this?" but "should more people here see it?". Predict the community well and your influence grows, so power stays bottom-up, not frozen with a few early insiders. This is the part theory can't tell you - it only works if people show up. So come in, post something, vote, and see how it feels. I think you'll get it.

Veridonia

A social feed run by people, not an algorithm

A social feed run by people, not an algorithm