Reviewers mostly see Solid as a strong tool for quickly building full-stack apps and MVPs, especially because it includes a real backend and can handle complex tasks with little code. Several say it stands out from Lovable, Replit, and similar tools by taking on more of the job end to end. The main friction is the credit system: users say credits run out quickly, sometimes while fixing errors, and pricing or usage limits can feel unclear. Support, though, is described as fast and helpful.
Auriko
awesome team and awesome product! what's your philosophy for harness design
Hey @tkeith and team. Lovely product.
Explored a lil bit. Will surely sit with patience to explore more on how this product actually works and if there is someone in my network to whom I can recommend this product.
BTW, smooth and clean UI. Loved iy
Congrats on the launch & best wishes :)
Solid
@whatshivamdo Great! Ask Solid for anything you are not sure - use it as the support. Try stuff that you couldn't do on other platforms ;)
1752vc Pitch Deck Analyzer
This is great. Full operating system in my hands.
Solid
@tmaleh_ Exactly!
Upstream
Looks cool! Excited to try
Solid
@louislecat Let us know what you think!
DocsAlot
great team, great product.
Solid
@new_user_2790a57d4d Thank you for the support!
Dial
the part that gives me pause isn't the coding, it's "creates accounts and pays for services" on its own. most SaaS ToS bans automated account creation, and payment processors flag exactly this pattern as fraud risk. when Solid signs up for a third-party service on a user's behalf, whose identity is on that account, and what happens when the provider bans it mid-task for looking like a bot? that seems like the actual ceiling on "human-level autonomy," not the coding quality.
Solid
@galdayan This is a very fair question. Solid signs up just like a human, so it should only be used for the user's real purpose and not spamming. On the backend, we also have a moderation layer on abnormal behaviors.
Dial
@riley_ss moderation on abnormal behavior makes sense as the fallback, but the thing I'm actually wondering is the everyday case, not the abuser case. if a provider's own bot-detection flags a completely legitimate task mid-run and bans the account, does the user just lose the money/progress and start over, or is there some recovery path? that's the failure mode that'd worry me most day to day