Why do AI-generated slides still feel worse than AI-generated web pages?
I've been thinking about this a lot while building in the presentation space.
When I ask an LLM to generate a landing page, the output is usually structurally coherent: headings, sections, hierarchy, readable typography. HTML/DOM gives the model something semantic to work with.
Slides are different. Under the hood, a slide deck is often a bag of objects placed at absolute coordinates text boxes, shapes, charts with weak structural semantics. Many AI slide tools respond by exporting images or rebuilding whole pages. That can look fine in a screenshot, but you lose editability and the result often falls apart when you need precise changes.
Hi all,
Two things most AI slide tools get wrong: they output elements hard to edit, and they rebuild slides from scratch with own design tasts. SEWPOINT does neither: it operates directly on native Google Slides objects, from plain language:
Native creation — real, editable text / tables / charts / shapes, built from your reference slides, Company Templates, or any inputs
Native editing — Beyond first draft: we own revision and handle tedious back-and-forth directly on your existing deck, it changes only what you ask; everything else stays exactly where it is.
Adapt to your template — we extract your existing google slide to a reusable Skill.md, to improve certainty and make sure your future modification consistent
Multiple-page tasks could be done in minutes with cost as low as 0.08 USD per slide (1USD = 100 credits)
Web app — sign up, paste your Google Slides link, no extra setup, no need to leave the familiar Google Slide UI, just input your instruction and let SEWPOINT do the rest
Beta: 200 free credits Tell me what breaks and what you'd want next 🙏