SEO Report Kit

Build client-ready SEO reports locally, no signup

4 followers

Build client-ready SEO reports locally, no signup

4 followers

Free local-first workspaces for SEO report briefs, audit checklists, and AI visibility tracking, plus editable templates and an open benchmark of 16 reporting resources. Everything runs in the browser; nothing is uploaded.

Free Options

Launch tags:Marketing•SEO•GitHub

Launch Team

Wispr Flow: Dictation That Works EverywhereStop typing. Start speaking. 4x faster.

Promoted

Maker

📌

Hi Product Hunt, I built SEO Report Kit for the recurring moment when a consultant needs to turn search data into a client-ready report without wiring up a full SaaS stack. What's inside: - SEO report and audit XLSX templates - GSC opportunity sheet CSV - AI search visibility checklist - synthetic sample reports for local service, SaaS, ecommerce, and blog sites - small generators for report briefs, audit checklists, and AI visibility checks - a public GitHub repo for the templates Everything is meant to be practical and editable. The sample data is synthetic, so you can inspect the structure without copying any client or third-party data. I'd love feedback on what should be included in the next template pack, especially from consultants who send monthly SEO reports.

Report

2mo ago

Maker

We also published the data behind the reporting workflow: a public-page benchmark of 16 SEO report resources, with the methodology and CSV open here: https://seoreportkit.com/research/seo-report-template-benchmark-2026/ The biggest gap was not KPI coverage; it was ownership, approval, and caveat fields.

Report

2mo ago

Local-first SEO tools that actually keep data in the browser are a nice change from the usual cloud-login dance, and the editable audit checklist saved me a solid chunk of time on a client brief.

Report

2mo ago

Forum Threads

p/seo-report-kit

•

1mo ago

4 gaps we found in 16 public SEO reporting resources

We audited 16 public SEO report templates, dashboards, workbooks, and reporting guides using a fixed public-page coding rule. Four findings stood out:

3/16 offered a direct download without an account.

4/16 documented AI-search visibility.

1/16 documented an approval workflow.

p/seo-report-kit

•

1mo ago

How do you prioritize opportunities in a GSC CSV export?

I kept running into the same problem after exporting Search Console data: sorting by impressions creates a long list, but it does not answer which signal deserves the next hour of work.

I built a local-only workflow that separates five review queues: striking-distance queries, site-relative CTR gaps, rising demand, decay, and page-level opportunities. The rules are deterministic and each result keeps the observed evidence separate from the recommended check.

It also avoids guessing a query-to-page relationship from separate Queries and Pages exports. That needs to be verified inside GSC.

The free tool runs in the browser and the CSV rows are never uploaded:

p/seo-report-kit

•

1mo ago

Which field is most often missing from client SEO reports?

We reviewed 16 public SEO reporting resources and found a clear gap after the metrics: only 2/16 publicly documented an owner or due date, 2/16 exposed a confidence or caveat field, and 1/16 described an approval workflow.

For people who send client reports, which missing field creates the most follow-up work: ownership, approvals, a work-completed log, or confidence notes?

Methodology and CSV: https://seoreportkit.com/researc...

View all