If you caught the Conversation Radar post, you know the premise: AI engines cite people talking about brands, so we built a radar for those conversations.
But there's a second half to AI visibility, and it's the one brands keep asking us about: the content you publish yourself.
Here's the honest version. Owned content works harder to earn a citation than third-party content does. We've tracked 13,000+ citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, and Claude, and brand articles DO show up in that set. The ones that do share a shape: they answer one specific query head-on, they carry real facts, and they cover the query from multiple angles, not one post.
Ran the audit on my own site and the gap report actually pointed to specific prompts my competitors were winning, not just vague score drops. The creator amplification angle is a clever way to push back into those AI answers.
Ran my site through it and the gap report actually showed me three competitors I had no idea were outranking me on Perplexity. The creator amplification angle is interesting too, way more actionable than just a score.
The gap report on ChatGPT versus Claude was eye-opening, I had no idea I was getting cited on one and completely ignored on the other. The creator amplification piece is a clever way to actually close the gap instead of just staring at a dashboard.
Macaly
geo is basically the new seo 🔥 nice execution. going after brands direct or agencies?
Scribble Network
@petrkovacik Thank you!
We work with both! :)
BetterClaw
EO is genuinely where the attention is moving and most brands are still asleep on it. good timing on this
Congrats on the launch, folks!
Scribble Network
@akhilbvs Thank you, friend! :)
@akhilbvs thank you serr!
ApyHub
This looks super interesting @kaavya_prasad
Let's go
Scribble Network
@iamsohail Thanks a ton Sohail! ^.^