Launching today
Your customers ask AI before they ask Google, and most brands have no idea whether they show up or lose to a competitor. Every other tool hands you a visibility score and stops there. Scribble does the whole loop: audit where you're invisible across every AI engine, create content that closes the gap, and amplify it through 50,000 creators who only get paid when AI cites them. A gap report won't win customers. Being the cited answer will.
I think the biggest value comes from connecting discovery with action. what happens if a brand already ranks well across several engines? Showing where effort brings the highest return could help users prioritize.
Scribble Network
@joan_garcamo If you already rank well, the value flips to defending your position (engines recycle sources, strong positions decay without upkeep) and finding the specific queries you're still losing. The effort vs return prioritization idea is genuinely good though. Taking that one away.
How do you actually verify that a piece of content got picked up by the AI engines versus just guessing based on prompt testing?
Scribble Network
@lkercmt2 Great question! Here's how we actually verify it: every time an AI engine (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, etc.) answers a question, it usually cites sources. We pull those cited source URLs directly from the AI's response and match them against our library of creator content — so if a TikTok or blog post pushed by one of our creators is a source behind an answer, we can show that exact link-up. It's not "does this prompt sound like it mentions us," it's "here's the actual source AI cited, and here's the creator piece it maps to."
Dropping screenshots below from our dashboard showing real citations for one of our clients mapped to the creator content behind them, so you can see it in action.
Happy to dig into any part of this further if useful!
TapRefer
This is a really interesting product to get AI visibility. But does UGC mean only a videos or it's mostly a text-based citation from creators??
Scribble Network
@jiteshghanchi We're trying to change that. If you use a product and write about it on Medium, it's as much UGC as an instagram post. However, we've seen citations from our network itself come from X, YouTube and even Instagram. For us, UGC means what it stands for - you're a user of a product and you create content about it.
Paying creators only on sustained citations is a smart anti-gaming filter, the three-times-a-week threshold especially. From the consumer app side my experience matches your thesis, discovery moved to communities and AI answers faster than any dashboard showed it. Do the bounty economics work for consumer mobile apps too, or does the loop only close for B2B where a cited answer is worth real contract money?
The live-query approach is the right call, but the thing that bit us building retrieval-backed answers is run-to-run variance. Ask the same model the same prompt twice and the cited sources shift even with temperature pinned, because the retrieval layer re-ranks on freshness and whatever got indexed that hour. So 'this post held as a source on this date' has a real noise floor under it. Do you sample each tracked query a few times to separate a piece genuinely falling out from the model just rolling different sources that run?
The creators-only-get-paid-when-AI-cites-them model is the part I would want to understand operationally, since that is the whole trust loop. AI answers rarely link sources deterministically and the citation shifts by model and even by re-asking the same query, so how do you attribute a specific AI citation back to the creator whose content earned it, cleanly enough to trigger a payout? Is that matching automated, or is there a human review step before creators get paid?
Ran the audit on my own site and the gap report actually flagged specific prompts where competitors were getting cited instead of me, which is way more useful than a generic score. The creator amplification piece is a clever angle I haven't seen elsewhere.
Scribble Network
@mirahazaraqb2 Thank you for actually running it! The specific prompts over generic score thing was exactly the design goal, a score tells you, you have a problem, the prompts tell you where to fight. Glad it helped!