LightfieldAI-native CRM that builds itself and does work for you
Promoted
Revolte
AI for Software Engineering
828 followers
AI for Software Engineering
828 followers
Revolte is for engineering teams to turn intent into production-ready software faster, safer, and with more control. Its agents plan changes, generate code, run quality and security checks, create PRs, support deployment, monitor runtime behavior, and surface risks early. Engineers approve the important decisions. Revolte handles the delivery heavy lifting. Built for higher delivery throughput across SDLC, stronger governance, and more value shipped per engineer.
This is the 2nd launch from Revolte. View more
Interactive Sessions
Launching today
Different work needs different AI oversight, and Revolte gives you both. Our Interactive Sessions let you drive the full lifecycle with the agents, step by step: architecture, code, tests, staging, deploy. You approve every step. Autopilot mode hands off a Jira ticket end-to-end, with agents planning, coding, opening the PR, and deploying. Same workspace, same governance: plan approval, inline diffs, cost caps, and audit trails, built in. Hands-on when you want control, hands-off when you don't.
Free Options
Launch Team / Built With
@rajagopalanar As a solo developer so far I've not considered full automation of my SDLC, but it may be something I consider in the future with tools like Revolte.
Revolte
@codeandsea Great point Brent. Frontier models and now Open-weight models have created huge opportunity for enterprises, startups and solo dev to develop software with AI - which I see as do more with less. We want Revolte to be gateway for this possibility.
Appreciate this,a lot of it makes sense. Especially chat-flow for the most of the SDLC
Revolte
Appreciate it, lot of work has gone into it.
Happy launch day team. Proud of this one. The interesting thing I found here is the CLI factory model
Revolte
@suvetha_devi_r yes, we believe CLI factory model is so powerful in having autonomy and greater control
No Jira required for Interactive sessions is a nice touch. Sometimes you just want to take an idea and start working on it without turning it into a ticket first.
Revolte
@gideon_henry Yes. Glad that you like this. We are also planning some feature that integrate with Jira for ticket grooming.
Revolte
Spent the last few months on Interactive Sessions. The question that drove the design: how fast can we get an engineer from sign up to seeing the agents do something genuinely useful in their own workflow?
Where we landed: sign in, open a tab, start a session. No Jira setup, no CI config, no long onboarding. The tabbed workspace works like your browser, one session per task, switch between them, close what you're done with.
You drive the full lifecycle step by step: architecture, code, tests, staging, preview, deploy. When the agents hit a judgment call, you get a focused prompt. When they're ready to touch your code, you see the plan, then the diff, then you approve or modify.
Autopilot is still there for the async work, connect Jira and tickets flow through end to end. But Interactive Sessions is the mode you'll live in day to day, and the one you can try in a minute without committing to anything.
Would love to hear what people think of the flow once you've tried it.
Really like the idea of how Revolte can work with both new ideas and existing codebase. Feels much closer to how real engineering teams actually work.
Lancepilot
Revolte
@priyankamandal Thanks for rightly pointing the governance angle. That is exactly the gap we are looking to close.
Revolte
@The @priyankamandal Great that you have noticed it. Yes, governance makes all the difference for enterprises and startups who wanted to have absolute control of their tech stack and customer data. @Revolte we are not just want AI to code but to use AI to automate entire SDLC where governance and security becomes the most important layers.