Review Frame
Review Ready Summaries, built from your GitHub work.
16 followers
Review Ready Summaries, built from your GitHub work.
16 followers
ReviewFrame turns your GitHub activity into clear, review-ready summaries. See what you worked on, where your focus went, and how you contributed across personal projects and organisations. Built for 1:1s, performance reviews, and year-end conversations. Read-only access. No scoring. No surveillance.
Hey Everyone 👋
I built ReviewFrame since preparing for 1:1s and performance reviews was always painful for me, getting tired of jumping across PRs and repos every time I had a 1:1 or performance review especially for year-end conversations.
ReviewFrame pulls that activity together into a clear, review-ready summary so you can talk about your work with confidence instead of digging through GitHub history.
It can also help organisations understand contribution focus and consistency at a glance , without invasive tracking.
I built the MVP integrating Github for now. My plan is to improve it based on feedback and expand it over time.🚀
👉 I’d love to know:
Do you face the same pain during 1:1s or reviews?
What would make this more useful for you?
Anything confusing or missing at first glance?
Thanks for checking it out
Would love honest feedback on what’s useful, missing, or confusing
DeepTagger
What if my git-history is not perfect, will it be able to ignore "noise"?
@avloss The reason I built ReviewFrame is most GitHub histories are chaos.
Developers work across multiple repos, mix small commits with big ones, squash things, rename things… and the end result is that your actual contribution gets buried under noise.
ReviewFrame doesn’t judge you on commit messages.
It looks at your activity in high-level ,PRs ,issues you opened or closed ,code reviews, repo - level contribution patterns and It automatically avoids noise and focuses on actual engineering work.
It also highlights:
Your most active repositories
The type of work you’ve been doing
Where your effort has gone over time
So even if your git history is messy (like everyone’s), you still get a clear, accurate picture of what you’ve accomplished.
If you try the product and feel something is missing or could be sharper, I’d love your suggestions . I’m improving this actively.
Thanks for the thoughtful question!
This really resonates 🙌
Turning messy GitHub activity into something you can actually talk about in 1:1s or reviews is such a real pain. I also appreciate the “no scoring, no surveillance” stance — that trust-first approach matters a lot. Congrats on shipping this! 🚀
Curious: have you seen more interest from individual devs or from managers/teams so far?
@elevenapril Hey , really appreciate you taking the time to leave that comment . I’m still early and haven’t gotten deep user feedback yet.From your experience, what’s the single hardest part of turning dev activity into something usable for reviews or 1:1s?