Quectis: Make consequential decisions with evidence, not instinct.

Hey Product Hunt 👋 I built Quectis because important product and business decisions are often made with plenty of information, but not enough structure around how the decision itself is reached. I wanted something that would do more than generate a confident-looking answer. Quectis creates competing strategies, surfaces the assumptions behind them, tests those assumptions against the evidence actually available, and then produces a recommendation with visible scores, trade-offs, and confidence limitations. One of the biggest things that evolved while building it was the treatment of uncertainty. If evidence is weak or missing, Quectis should say that clearly rather than quietly turning assumptions into facts. That became a core design principle. The workflow now goes from: decision definition → competing strategies → assumption testing → recommendation → bounded execution plan. Quectis is live now for founders and product leaders making consequential decisions. I’d really value feedback from people who regularly have to make high-stakes product or business choices: What would you need to see before trusting a system like this with one of your real decisions?