QA.tech uses AI agents to replicate human QA testers, scanning web apps to understand functionality and generate complete test suites. Tests can be run automatically on every release, on a schedule, or manually, ensuring scalable and reliable quality assurance
QA.tech Reviews
The community submitted 7 reviews to tell us what they like about QA.tech, what QA.tech can do better, and more.
4.3
Based on 7 reviews
Review QA.tech?
Reviews praise QA.tech for quickly mapping app workflows, generating useful test suites, and catching bugs that traditional scripts miss. Users highlight intuitive setup, live agent interactions that ease fine-tuning, and faster regression cycles that help teams ship with confidence. Several note dependable coverage and clear bug reports. Critiques focus on performance lag and onboarding friction, with one serious callout about plaintext password exposure that needs urgent remediation. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, especially for startups and fast-moving teams, provided security and speed improve.
+4
Summarized with AI
Pros
Cons
Reviews
Most Informative
QA.tech
AI agents (transformer LLMs) use plain text indeed, so it makes sense you've seen your credential exposed.
We recommend our users create dedicated accounts for AI agents or hide their dev/staging under SSH tunnels: https://docs.qa.tech/core-concepts/configs
But ideally you're right, we should make a way for our AI agent to use credentials in a more secure way.