Most AI proposal tools give everyone the same generic output. This one is built on what actually drives reply rates. Hits the 150–250 word Upwork sweet spot, auto-extracts screening questions (70% of rejections miss these), writes in your real voice, and tells you which work sample to attach (+35% reply rate). Runs on your own Claude API key (~$0.01/proposal). One-time purchase. No installation needed.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for Proposal Engine
Maker
📌
I built this after losing too many Upwork jobs despite having solid skills and competitive rates. Turns out my proposals were the problem — too long, missed screening questions, sounded like every other AI proposal.
Dug into the data on what actually drives reply rates, then built a tool around those specific signals. Would love honest feedback from freelancers here — what would make you actually use something like this?
Report
how does it actually learn my voice from just a few past proposals, and does it keep improving the more i use it or stay static after the initial setup
Report
Maker
@sena102881 It's not ML — Claude uses your writing sample as a style reference in the prompt each time. So it doesn't improve on its own, but you can update the sample whenever you want. Most people tweak it once after seeing the first few outputs and that's usually enough.
Report
the screening question auto-extraction is genuinely clever, that's the piece most freelancers (including me) consistently screw up and it's refreshing to see a tool that treats it as the core problem instead of an afterthought
Report
Maker
@aminejllp Yeah that was the whole starting point honestly. Most tools just generate text and call it done — ignoring screening questions is one of the main reasons proposals get filtered before anyone even reads them.
how does it actually learn my voice from just a few past proposals, and does it keep improving the more i use it or stay static after the initial setup
@sena102881
It's not ML — Claude uses your writing sample as a style reference in the prompt each time. So it doesn't improve on its own, but you can update the sample whenever you want. Most people tweak it once after seeing the first few outputs and that's usually enough.
the screening question auto-extraction is genuinely clever, that's the piece most freelancers (including me) consistently screw up and it's refreshing to see a tool that treats it as the core problem instead of an afterthought
@aminejllp
Yeah that was the whole starting point honestly. Most tools just generate text and call it done — ignoring screening questions is one of the main reasons proposals get filtered before anyone even reads them.