Releasing fast shouldn’t mean breaking things. As your product grows, Ogoron takes over your QA process end‑to‑end. It understands your product, generates and maintains tests, and continuously validates every change - replacing a systems analyst, test analyst, and QA engineer. Get predictable releases, fewer bugs in production, and full coverage without manual effort. Ship faster. Stay in control. Break nothing





Free Options
Launch Team / Built With


I honestly don’t really get it, but no matter how much I look at TDD, I can’t seem to understand it. Should it be done before the code review stage, or after code review, just before the final product check?
Ogoron
@adamspong Thanks for the question. To clarify, Ogoron is not about strict TDD in the classic sense. It is an automated QA system that generates, maintains, and runs tests as the product evolves.
In most workflows, that fits before code review: when a branch is ready, tests are refreshed, smoke checks run on pushes, and the broader suite can run before review or merge
That's great! Does it require any special permissions or firewall rules?
Ogoron
@anna_drobysheva Good follow-up question.
No special firewall rules are required beyond normal outbound access for the CI job. The main thing is that the runner can reach our services and the OpenAI API.
On the permissions side, it is also fairly standard: repository access, and if you want automated change flows, permission to commit or create changes back into the repo.
We also support file-level allowlisting, so if there are parts of the repository or configuration you want to keep outside the agent’s scope, that can be restricted
How quickly can I get help if the integration fails? Our release is time‑sensitive
Ogoron
@daniil_kadeev Thanks – very important question.
A big part of the value here is that Ogoron generates tests which can then be used independently of Ogoron itself. We also do not restrict running those tests through Ogoron, and test execution remains free, so this part of the workflow is not something we want teams to feel locked into or blocked on.
For early users, we are also quite hands-on with integration support. If something blocks setup or rollout, we usually help directly and quickly rather than leaving the team to handle it alone
Is there an official GitLab CI template or example .gitlab-ci.yml snippet?
Ogoron
@astepanov Thank you for your question – yes, we already have example snippets for several common GitLab CI setups in our docs at docs.ogoron.ai.
If your pipeline is a bit more specific, we can usually help adapt a template for it fairly quickly.
The main caveat today is that GitLab is not yet fully supported through the self-serve dashboard: repository connection there is still GitHub-first. But if you want to test Ogoron with GitLab, feel free to reach out to me or Nick for early access
How does Ogoron authenticate with our private repos and runners?
Ogoron
@toki_tango Great question!
In practice, Ogoron is a CLI-first tool, so authentication is usually handled by the environment it runs in. For GitHub, we already support private repositories through our main integration and billing flow.
For other Git systems, the setup is still more manual today, but it is straightforward to support via the CLI as well. If that is relevant for your setup, feel free to reach out to me at vmynka@ogoron.com for early access.
As for private runners, there are no special restrictions on our side. The main requirement is that the runner must have network access to our services and to the external LLM provider endpoints we use, which currently means OpenAI
Does it support Dockerized applications and container orchestration tools like Kubernetes or AWS ECS? Most of our stack runs in containers.
Ogoron
@aleh_suprunovich Thanks for the question! Yes – containerized applications are very much in scope for us, and Docker is currently the primary path we support.
Deeper support for orchestration layers like Kubernetes and AWS ECS is still on our roadmap, but in practice containerized environments are usually a natural fit for Ogoron rather than a problem. The container boundary gives us a fairly clean and unified system-under-test, which is often helpful for automation
Can I set up automated weekly QA health reports to stakeholders? Saves me from manual updates.
Ogoron
Thanks for the question. Not yet – automated weekly stakeholder reports are not a built-in feature today. But reporting workflows and external integrations are already on the roadmap, and this is a use case I take seriously.
For now, some reporting can already be implemented through custom CI/CD flows around the CLI. If you want to set this up, email me at vmynka@ogoron.com and I’ll share template CI/CD setups for your system