Hi Product Hunt 👋

I’m Fabry, a solo maker from Italy.

I built Obliqo because I kept running into the same painful pattern in my own workflow:

A draft feels solid while you’re writing it.

Then you publish.

And only after that, readers, customers, or the comment section find the weak point.

Obliqo brings that moment forward — privately, before you hit publish.

You paste a draft — a launch post, landing page, essay, memo, or public argument — and four distinct AI critics analyze it from strictly isolated angles:

• The Researcher checks whether your core claims actually hold up against reality.

• The Resonance Amplifier finds what lands, what feels flat, and what should be protected.

• The Distortion Finder looks for hidden assumptions, logical leaps, and weak framing.

• The Editorial Ally reads for structure, cohesion, tone, and what may need to be cut.

They operate in total isolation. They cannot see each other’s output.

That structural blindness is the point.

True cognitive friction does not come from asking a single AI chatbot to “be harsh.” It comes from separate, uncontaminated readings that overlap, disagree, or independently hit the same fragile spot.

A final synthesis layer then gives you a structured readout:

STANDS — What holds.
BENDS — What needs pressure.
GIVES — What may break.
Plus one open focus question only you can answer.

Obliqo does not rewrite your text. That is deliberate.

Most AI writing tools try to improve your prose by replacing or smoothing your voice. Obliqo does the opposite: it leaves your words alone and shows you where the draft may fail.

We find the cracks. You decide how to rebuild.

It is a private critique layer for people who still want to think for themselves — founders, builders, researchers, writers, and anyone about to publish something that matters.

I’d love honest feedback from the community.

👉 Try it today: https://obliqo.pyragogy.org/

If you have a draft for your next launch, a new landing page section, or an upcoming essay, paste it into Obliqo.

Let’s see what stands, what bends, and what breaks before the world reads it.

Would you use a tool that refuses to rewrite your draft and only shows you where it might break?
Does the “no rewriting” constraint make the product stronger or less convenient?
What would make you trust — or distrust — this kind of isolated AI critique?