Hey everyone I built Mush because I kept running into the same problem. Even with a fast connection, downloads would get limited by a single interface or a small number of connections, while other networks on the system were just idle. I tested this pretty heavily before putting it out. For HTTP, I used files in the 400MB to 1GB range. For torrents, I tested with multiple files between 8GB and 12GB, running them three times across different setups. On HTTP, a download that would normally take around 10 minutes in a browser dropped to about 30 to 60 seconds with Mush on a single network, and closer to 10 to 20 seconds when multiple interfaces were active. For torrents, the gains were less extreme but more consistent. Speeds were roughly 2x in most cases, and it handled low seed torrents better without dropping or stalling as much. Mush tries to make better use of what is already available by splitting downloads across interfaces and managing them in parallel. It is still in beta and there are edge cases, so I am mainly looking for feedback from different setups. If you try it, I am interested in how it behaves on your network, especially where it does not improve much or breaks.

Mush

Warp-Drive for Downloads.

Warp-Drive for Downloads.