Mima reviews letters and decisions from public authorities and flags procedural errors: missing service of process, broken deadlines, wrong legal basis, contradictions in the record. The language model reads. Code decides. Every flag is traceable to the exact passage and the rule it triggered. Zero persistence: in-memory processing, 30-day cache, PII auto-masked, no training on user data. Built on 5 patent filings at the Swedish Patent Office. EU AI Act ready.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for Mima Solutions AB
Maker
š
First comment:
```
Hi Product Hunt š
I'm Neda, founder of Mima.
Public authorities make procedural mistakes every day ā wrong service of process, missed deadlines, decisions issued without the legal basis they cite. Almost no one catches them. Not the citizen, not the caseworker, not the lawyer hired three weeks later.
Mima is a review engine. The language model reads the document. Code evaluates it against procedural rules. Every flag points back to the exact passage and the exact rule. No "AI thinks" ā traceable logic.
What's shipped today:
⢠5 patent filings at the Swedish Patent Office (sole inventor)
⢠Consumer product: upload any letter from a Swedish authority, get a procedural review in under a minute
⢠Decision Gate for municipalities reviewing their own decisions before they go out
⢠Zero persistence ā documents gone in 30 days, PII never touches the model, no training on user data
Why now: the EU AI Act enters full application on 2 August 2026. Every public authority in Europe needs a way to show that automated and assisted decisions are reviewable. Most are still pretending the problem doesn't exist.
Honest feedback wanted, especially from anyone who's worked inside a public authority, a law firm, or has fought a decision themselves. What would make you trust a tool like this on a real case?
Try it: https://www.mimasolution.com
ā Neda
```