Curious what everyone's actually using day-to-day.
When I was building Max, I kept running into the same problem: my growth "stack" was 4 5 disconnected tools that didn't talk to each other. Ahrefs for backlinks, ChatGPT for copy, Google Search Console for rankings, a spreadsheet for action items. It worked, but it was exhausting to maintain and easy to ignore.
So I started asking other founders what they were doing and most said some version of the same thing: "I know I should be doing more on SEO/content, but I don't have the time or the system."
That frustration is exactly what Max is built around. One advisor that knows your site, your competitors, and your goals and tells you what to do next, not just what the data says.
How does it decide what the "one thing" is when there are usually a handful of issues competing for attention, and how often does it refresh that recommendation as my site or competitors change?
@kezibannkbe Great question, and honestly one of the core problems I was trying to solve.
Max pulls together a few different signals: your domain authority, keyword rankings, on-page health, and competitor data. It weights them by impact versus effort, so a quick win that could move a ranking keyword gets prioritised over a big structural fix that takes months to show results.
The recommendation isn't a one-time static output either. As you chat with Max, run SERP checks, or your rankings shift, the context updates and the advice follows.
For refreshing data, Pro users can pull fresh DA, backlinks, and referring domain data on demand. And the longer you use Max, the more specific the recommendations get because it builds up a history of what it's already flagged and what you've acted on.
What kind of issues are you usually juggling? Technical stuff, content gaps, or more competitor pressure?