LiveKit

The open source platform for real-time communication

5.0•36 reviews•

640 followers

The open source platform for real-time communication

5.0•36 reviews•

640 followers

Visit website

Team collaboration software

•

Video conferencing

•

Video and Voice calling

•

Realtime Voice AI

•

AI Voice Agent Infrastructure

LiveKit is free, open source infrastructure for building and scaling real-time audio and video experiences in your applications. Use our APIs to easily build audio-only spaces, live classrooms, in-game video chat, collaborative screen sharing, and more.

The Best LiveKit Alternatives

The best LiveKit alternatives are Daily.co, Dyte, Agora Video, Zoom, and Vapi.

Daily.co

4.9 ·

Choose Daily.co if...

✓you want managed WebRTC with minimal ops
✓you need the simplest embedded video integration
✓you’re building voice AI with Pipecat pipelines

See details ↓

Dyte

5.0 ·

Choose Dyte if...

✓you need to ship embedded calls fast
✓you want plugin-style features out of the box
✓you value high-touch onboarding and support

See details ↓

Agora Video

5.0 ·

Choose Agora Video if...

✓you need reliable low-latency VoIP and video
✓you want flexible cloud recording configurations
✓you prefer a straightforward SDK setup

See details ↓

Zoom

4.6 ·

Choose Zoom if...

✓you need familiar meetings for non-technical users
✓you want webinars, recording, and screen share built-in
✓you don’t want to build a custom call UI

See details ↓

Vapi

4.9 ·

Choose Vapi if...

✓you’re building AI phone agents quickly
✓you want natural voices with easy orchestration
✓you need many LLM STT TTS choices

See details ↓

What to Consider

LiveKit is a popular choice for teams that want an infrastructure-first, highly controllable real-time stack for building custom video, audio, and interactive experiences. The alternatives split into a few clear camps: Daily and Dyte emphasize a faster, more “batteries-included” path to embedding calling with less WebRTC complexity, Agora focuses on reliable low-latency SDKs with notable recording flexibility, and Zoom is the familiar, feature-complete meeting product that “just works” for end users without any build effort. On the AI side, Vapi (and Daily’s Pipecat ecosystem) represent a different approach entirely—higher-level voice agent and audio pipeline platforms for shipping voice experiences quickly rather than assembling the full RTC and orchestration stack yourself.

In evaluating LiveKit alternatives, we looked at time-to-integration and developer experience, reliability and call quality, global performance and scalability, recording/streaming capabilities, and how much is provided out of the box versus left to custom build. We also considered support quality and ecosystem depth (especially for voice/AI workflows), along with practical constraints like pricing tiers and how well each option fits common use cases such as telehealth, customer support, webinars, and voice agents.

Daily.co

Real-time voice, video, and AI for developers

4.9 · 17 reviews

Learn more →

Daily takes a “batteries-included” approach to real-time video that can feel dramatically faster to ship than an infrastructure-first stack like LiveKit. It’s designed to hide the gnarly parts of WebRTC while still giving teams enough control to build a branded, embedded calling experience.

Where Daily stands out is the path from zero to production: the integration is intentionally simple, and core capabilities like calling, recording, and streaming are available without assembling as many moving pieces. That makes it a strong fit when the goal is shipping a reliable in-browser experience quickly, with less operational overhead.

Daily is also a compelling alternative when voice AI is central to the roadmap. Its Pipecat ecosystem and real-time audio plumbing make it easier to iterate on voice pipelines, swap providers, and connect client audio to server-side intelligence without rebuilding the transport layer.

If LiveKit’s flexibility is more than needed, Daily’s managed experience, strong WebRTC expertise, and developer-friendly ergonomics can be the more pragmatic choice for many embedded use cases.

Best for

Best for product teams that want managed WebRTC video and voice with minimal operational burden.

Standout features

✓Managed WebRTC video calling
✓Recording and live streaming built in
✓Simple embeddable SDK
✓Pipecat voice agent ecosystem
✓Real-time client-to-server audio

Dyte

Integrate live experiences into your product within minutes

5.0 · 17 reviews

Learn more →

Speed-to-production is Dyte’s biggest advantage over LiveKit, especially for teams that don’t want to engineer every piece of the calling experience. The SDK is geared toward getting a polished, embedded video calling flow live quickly, with common features available out of the box.

Dyte’s plugin-oriented model is a practical differentiator when the product needs more end-user functionality without custom UI work. Instead of assembling features from lower-level primitives, teams can lean on ready-made building blocks and ship a complete experience sooner.

Another reason Dyte competes well with infra-first platforms is the onboarding and support posture. High-touch guidance can reduce integration risk and shorten the iteration cycle, which matters when video is mission-critical and timelines are tight.

For use cases like telehealth, customer support, and webinars, Dyte tends to be the better fit when time, simplicity, and packaged features outweigh the need for maximum infrastructure control.

Best for

Ideal for teams that need to launch embedded video calling fast with minimal custom build.

Standout features

✓Fast integration for embedded video
✓Plugin-based feature extensions
✓Developer dashboard and clear docs
✓High-touch onboarding support
✓Built-in webinar-style experiences

Agora Video

SDK for high-quality real-time audio & video communication

5.0 · 3 reviews

Learn more →

Agora Video is a strong alternative to LiveKit when the priority is a straightforward, reliable SDK for low-latency voice and HD video. It’s well-suited to product teams that want to embed RTC capabilities without adopting an infrastructure-centric architecture.

One of Agora’s clearest strengths is recording flexibility. Being able to configure cloud recording for individual channels alongside a combined recording can simplify post-production, compliance, or multi-speaker workflows where separate tracks matter.

Integration tends to be pragmatic and developer-friendly, making it easier to standardize RTC capabilities across multiple applications or surfaces. That can be appealing compared to the deeper customization and operational choices that often come with LiveKit.

If the core requirement is dependable real-time communication plus robust recording options, Agora provides a clean path that emphasizes implementation speed and predictable performance.

Best for

Best for teams embedding low-latency VoIP/video with robust cloud recording needs.

Standout features

✓Low-latency VoIP and HD video
✓Cloud recording with flexible channel options
✓Straightforward SDK integration
✓Built for embedded RTC experiences

Zoom

Video communication made simple and easy

4.6 · 339 reviews

Learn more →

Zoom wins when the goal isn’t to build real-time video into a product, but to run meetings that participants already know how to join. Compared with LiveKit, it trades customization for immediacy, familiarity, and a predictable end-user experience.

It’s also far more feature-complete out of the box, with mature screen sharing, recording, host controls, and meeting management. For client-facing calls, training, walkthroughs, and internal collaboration, that completeness often matters more than having a bespoke UI.

Zoom’s biggest advantage is reducing friction for non-technical attendees. When time-to-join and “just works” reliability are the primary concerns, an established meeting product can outperform any embedded approach.

If the project doesn’t require an integrated RTC experience inside an app, Zoom is often the simplest route to dependable video communication at scale.

Best for

Best for organizations that need familiar, reliable meetings without building custom RTC.

Standout features

✓One-click joining for participants
✓Screen sharing and cloud recording
✓Webinars and host controls
✓Works well on weaker connections
✓Mature meeting management tools

Vapi

Voice AI for developers

4.9 · 24 reviews

Learn more →

Vapi is a better alternative to LiveKit when the product is fundamentally a voice agent, not a custom RTC experience. Instead of providing real-time media infrastructure primitives, it offers a higher-level voice platform focused on orchestration, iteration speed, and getting AI calling experiences into production.

A key differentiator is the developer workflow: teams can integrate quickly, experiment with conversation logic, and ship multi-agent experiences without stitching together telephony, STT, TTS, and LLM routing on their own. That makes Vapi attractive for prototypes that need to harden into production systems fast.

Voice quality and configurability are central to the platform, with a broad menu of provider choices to tune latency, cost, and realism. It’s an especially strong fit when the team wants flexibility in models and vendors without rewriting the stack.

For builders who would otherwise use LiveKit as a transport layer and then build the rest, Vapi can remove entire layers of engineering by packaging the voice product surface at a higher abstraction level.