LiveKit

The open source platform for real-time communication

5.0•37 reviews•

665 followers

The open source platform for real-time communication

5.0•37 reviews•

665 followers

Visit website

Team collaboration software

•

Video conferencing

•

Video and Voice calling

•

Realtime Voice AI

•

AI Voice Agent Infrastructure

LiveKit is free, open source infrastructure for building and scaling real-time audio and video experiences in your applications. Use our APIs to easily build audio-only spaces, live classrooms, in-game video chat, collaborative screen sharing, and more.

The Best LiveKit Alternatives

The best LiveKit alternatives are Daily.co, 100ms Video SDK, Dyte, Zoom, and Whereby.

Daily.co

4.9 ·

Choose Daily.co if...

✓you want managed WebRTC with minimal setup
✓you're building real-time AI voice agents
✓you need SIP dial-in and dial-out calling

See details ↓

100ms Video SDK

4.5 ·

Choose 100ms Video SDK if...

✓you need ultra-low latency and strong reliability
✓you're running high-stakes moderated research sessions
✓you want hands-on support to ship faster

See details ↓

Dyte

5.0 ·

Choose Dyte if...

✓you want plugin-heavy video features out of box
✓you need telehealth-style visits live quickly
✓you value high-touch onboarding and support

See details ↓

Zoom

4.6 ·

Choose Zoom if...

✓your users already know Zoom workflows
✓you need webinars, breakouts, and recordings built-in
✓you want a complete app, not infrastructure

See details ↓

Whereby

4.9 ·

Choose Whereby if...

✓you want guests joining instantly via a URL
✓you need persistent rooms for a virtual office
✓you prefer simple meetings without feature bloat

See details ↓

What to Consider

LiveKit is a go-to choice for teams that want programmable, scalable real-time video and audio—more infrastructure than “meeting app,” with the flexibility to build exactly what you need. The alternatives span a wide spectrum: Daily leans into a batteries-included managed WebRTC experience and real-time AI/voice-agent building blocks (plus telephony workflows), 100ms emphasizes enterprise-grade reliability and low-latency performance, and Dyte packages a plugin-heavy, ship-fast collaboration layer with high-touch support. On the other end, Zoom and Whereby prioritize familiarity and zero-friction joins—great when end-user adoption matters more than deep customization—while trading off some of the build-your-own control LiveKit offers.

In evaluating options, the key considerations were integration effort and developer ergonomics, call quality and reliability under real-world conditions, feature completeness (recording, streaming/webinars, moderation), extensibility and integrations (including AI/voice and SIP/telephony), scalability for global usage, and the practical trade-offs in pricing and operational overhead.

Daily.co

Real-time voice, video, and AI for developers

4.9 · 17 reviews

Learn more →

Daily is a strong LiveKit alternative when the priority is a managed, batteries-included WebRTC stack that removes a lot of infrastructure and operational complexity. It gets teams to a production-ready calling experience quickly while still offering enough low-level hooks to customize behavior when needed.

Where Daily really differentiates is its focus on real-time AI and voice-agent building blocks, including an ecosystem approach that makes it easier to iterate on models and speech components without rebuilding the transport layer. For AI-first products, it can feel like a more purpose-built path than assembling everything around a pure infrastructure core.

Daily is also compelling for phone-connected experiences thanks to SIP interconnect and dial-in/dial-out workflows, which can reduce the glue code and vendor stitching required for telephony. If the goal is to ship reliable video or audio sessions fast, with recording/streaming and pragmatic primitives for modern AI voice apps, Daily tends to be the more turnkey choice versus LiveKit.

Best for

Best for teams that want managed WebRTC and are building real-time AI voice or video experiences.

Standout features

✓Managed WebRTC calling infrastructure
✓AI voice-agent ecosystem and integrations
✓SIP interconnect with dial-in/dial-out
✓Recording and live streaming support

100ms Video SDK

Add live video conferencing to your app in hours, not months

4.5 · 4 reviews

Learn more →

Latency and session stability are the main reasons 100ms Video SDK stands out as an alternative to LiveKit. It’s built for teams that need video to hold up under demanding, high-signal conditions where even small drops or lag can break the workflow.

It’s particularly well-suited to enterprise pilots and research-style sessions where reliability is a product feature, not just an implementation detail. When the use case includes simultaneous instrumentation, analysis, or other heavy workloads alongside video, 100ms is often chosen for its performance-first posture.

Another advantage is speed to implementation with hands-on vendor support, which can matter when timelines are tight and a team doesn’t want to own as much RTC plumbing. If LiveKit feels like more control than necessary for the job, 100ms can be a simpler path to dependable production video at scale.

Best for

Ideal for enterprise and research teams that need consistently low-latency, highly reliable video.

Standout features

✓Low-latency global video infrastructure
✓Reliability-focused session performance
✓Developer-friendly quick start
✓Hands-on implementation support

Dyte

Integrate live experiences into your product within minutes

5.0 · 17 reviews

Learn more →

Dyte takes a more packaged, feature-forward approach than LiveKit, making it appealing when the goal is to embed video calling without building a full collaboration layer from scratch. It’s designed to help teams ship a polished experience quickly, leaning on ready-made components and plugins.

The plugin ecosystem is a core differentiator: instead of assembling common meeting features piece by piece, Dyte emphasizes modular add-ons that cover practical needs like webinars and structured session experiences. That can reduce engineering overhead and accelerate iteration for product teams.

Dyte also tends to win when high-touch onboarding and responsive support are essential to launch success. For telehealth-style visits, video customer support, or event/webinar workflows where time-to-production matters more than maximum infrastructure control, Dyte is often the more direct alternative to LiveKit.

Best for

Best for product teams that want a plug-and-play video experience and fast go-live timelines.

Standout features

✓Plugin-based video feature modules
✓Prebuilt UI components and layouts
✓Webinar and event-style experiences
✓Strong onboarding and support

Zoom

Video communication made simple and easy

4.6 · 341 reviews

Learn more →

Ubiquity is Zoom’s biggest advantage over LiveKit: most users already know how to join, present, and troubleshoot a Zoom call. For client-facing meetings or external workshops, that familiarity can eliminate onboarding friction that even the best embedded experience can’t fully avoid.

Zoom is also a complete, mature product rather than infrastructure, with a broad set of meeting and webinar capabilities like breakout rooms, recording, and screen sharing. Teams that don’t want to own hosting, scaling, and RTC operations often choose Zoom because it’s predictable and well-integrated into common workplace workflows.

The trade-off is customization: Zoom is less about building a bespoke experience and more about adopting a standardized one. If reliability, presentation features, and a universally recognized join flow matter more than deep programmability, Zoom is a practical LiveKit alternative.

Best for

Ideal for teams running external meetings and webinars where familiarity beats customization.

Standout features

✓Familiar join experience for most users
✓Breakout rooms and webinar features
✓Reliable screen sharing and recording
✓Calendar and workflow integrations

Whereby

Beautiful, simple video calls in your browser

4.9 · 17 reviews

Learn more →

Whereby is optimized for zero-friction meetings: guests can join directly in the browser with just a URL, which can be a decisive advantage over more build-heavy approaches like LiveKit. That simplicity reduces support burden, especially for client calls where participants won’t install apps or manage accounts.

A key differentiator is the persistent room model, which works well for recurring sessions, lightweight client check-ins, and “virtual office” setups that stay available all day. Instead of building a scheduling and access layer, teams can rely on stable room links and quick entry.

Whereby focuses on the essentials—chat, screen sharing, and straightforward room controls—without the complexity of a fully customizable RTC stack. If the product requirement is “a meeting that just starts” rather than an embedded communications platform with deep controls, Whereby is often the better fit than LiveKit.