LBES: Explain your strategy. Verify it. Turn it into software.

AI can write trading code. But the harder part is making sure it builds what the trader actually meant. I built LBES around that gap. A trader explains their strategy in their own words → LBES asks adaptive questions to uncover the rules, conditions and exceptions → the trader reviews and edits the strategy specification → only then do we engineer it into TradingView or MT5 software and test it. The key idea is simple: Explain → Verify → Engineer. I’m especially interested in one question: Does reviewing the exact strategy specification before engineering make you trust the process more than simply asking an AI to build the strategy directly? LBES is live. I’d genuinely like feedback on where this workflow feels useful, unnecessary, or still incomplete.