I’m a final‑year engineering student working on Python and ML projects, so Kiro’s spec‑driven approach to agentic development really caught my eye. Treating structured specs as the main unit of work – and then using the AI IDE to turn those specs into plans, code, and iterations – feels like a much healthier alternative to “vibe coding” when you actually want to go from prototype to production. I also like the focus on giving developers granular control over context and agent hooks, so AI can help with big refactors and deployments without becoming a black box across the codebase. I’m curious how teams balance working at the spec level versus dropping back into normal line‑by‑line coding inside Kiro, especially on larger projects where requirements change frequently.
Raycast
Sorry, where does this fit in the landscape between @Cursor , @Windsurf, @Lovable, and @V0.dev ??
Product Hunt
@chrismessina I'm going to guess when Cursor changes their pricing again, they'll try to sweep in. Also, don't forget @Trae lol
There is no way to evaluate it. Waitlist for the launch.
I would love to try it out. It would be a bit more helpful if they gave you a sense of the wait time.
I watched a video on YouTube and it piqued my interest but I have since asked around and no one that I know has actually tried it.
I would love to hear feedback from anyone who has actually tried Kiro.
Linkinize
Kiro looks like a sleek AI-powered IDE designed to take you smoothly from prototype to production. It sounds promising for developers looking to speed up their workflow. I’ll give it a try when I get a chance. Congrats on the launch 🚀
Kiro looks really promising—feels like it has the chops to outperform Cursor. Excited to see how it evolves!
Ask ChatGPT
AICamp
Kiro's capability looks great at first glance. Congratulations @adithya @swaminator