The community submitted 660 reviews to tell
us what they like about GitHub, what GitHub can do better, and
more.
5.0
Based on 660 reviews
Review GitHub?
Reviewers describe GitHub as the default home for code: a reliable place for version control, pull requests, issues, reviews, releases, and CI/CD that keeps teams aligned and helps solo developers ship faster. Users repeatedly praise its deep integrations, open-source community, and tools like Actions and Pages. Makers of Warp and TestMu AI echo that, highlighting public repos, PRs, issues, and built-in CI in one place. Main complaints are complexity for beginners, confusing advanced settings, weak mobile and search, occasional slowness, and pricing friction.
+666
Summarized with AI
Pros
Cons
Tines The single, secure environment for agents, apps, and automations.
Every Studio Practice project, macsim included, lives in a GitHub repo from
day one. The single-file structure of macsim made history trivial to read
— every UI tweak is one diff, one commit. Free private repos, push, done.
The default substrate.
The TestSprite 2.1 GitHub integration wouldn't exist without GitHub's robust PR and Actions infrastructure. Every test suite generated by TestSprite MCP now runs automatically on every pull request, with results posted directly on the PR and merge blocking when tests fail.
GitHub Releases was the easiest path to distributing a DMG to people who don't know me. One release, one download link, version history built in. For an open-source solo project where discoverability matters, GitLab felt like hiding it.
GitHub is a truly revolutionary product which I use for all product development work. Under the free tier we can keep private repositories and collaborate over it as a team. This is a great products for startups who want to be lean in terms of costs and effective in terms of processes.