Most content is invisible to AI search because it wasn't built to be cited. GEO Checker scores any content out of 100 across 6 dimensions: quotability, structure, specificity, authority signals, query match, and platform fit. Shows citation likelihood across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and Meta AI. Pulls up what's surfacing for your query and the exact gap. Free. No signup.
FramerLaunch websites with enterprise needs at startup speeds.
Promoted
Maker
📌
Hello everyone!
I'm Kaavya, co-founder of Scribble. I've been in crypto and web3 since 2016, built Lumos Labs, ran some of India's biggest hackathons, built buidl.so, shipped and sunset a few things along the way. The through line across all of it has been community and content, how you get people to find things, talk about things, and trust things.
Scribble is where that all came together. We're an AI search visibility platform for brands, we connect them with 50,000+ creators publishing structured content across Medium, Substack, Reddit, LinkedIn, and Paragraph, specifically targeting the queries their customers are asking AI engines. The goal is citations, getting brands named when someone asks ChatGPT, Perplexity or any LLM a question in their space.
That insight is what Scribble is built on, and after running enough campaigns to see the pattern clearly, I wanted to build something that makes this gap visible to anyone, not just brands working with us.
GEO Checker scores any content out of 100 across 6 structural properties that correlate with AI citation. It shows you what's actually surfacing on Google for similar queries, the specific gap between those pieces and yours, and the questions people are really asking around your topic, so you know exactly what to fix and what to write next.
Would love your feedback:
1) What score did your content get, and did the fixes feel accurate?
2) Did the surfacing section show useful comparisons?
3) What type of content did you test?
I'd love any other feedback and upgrades you may have, happy to build it out.
Report
Tried GEO Checker and really liked how practical it feels.
Tested a long-form article and the scoring + recommendations were surprisingly accurate, especially around structure, query alignment, and citation potential. The “surfacing” section was the standout for me seeing what content AI engines are likely pulling from made the gaps very clear.
Report
I used this product to check the LLM citability of my upcoming content piece, and it helped me assess how citable the content is. I’ll use the feedback to further refine and tweak the content. Great product.
Report
Maker
@nitinvinay Thank you! Do share your score after you've integrated the feedback provided. :)
Report
I have tried and it's actually helpful, because the way it judge the content on different parameters, gives transparency and a visible space for improvement.
Report
I just tested this by pasting a long article I wrote last week, and it gave me a GEO score right away no sign‑up, super quick. It’s interesting to see where my writing stands before I publish. I’ll probably run my next blog through this first to catch things earlier. Nice to have something simple that gives instant feedback.
Report
I tried a long format article that I pushed last week on Medium and scored 37/100. Great insight on my content strategy and structure. Will try this before posting my next blog too.
This tool is a real eye-opner. I was under the impression that my articles did fairly well when an organic AI search is conducted. But the article score opened my eyes and pointed out the flaws straight in my face. Next time onwards I'm surely to check my articles with this tool before publishing any of them.
What needs improvement
Nothing as such
vs Alternatives
I find this user-friendly and the detailed break down is very helpful for improving writing
This was a real eye-opener. Been watching a lot of videos about GEO but I didn't know how to tell if my content was GEO friendly or not. Appreciate the fix list especially
Tried GEO Checker and really liked how practical it feels.
Tested a long-form article and the scoring + recommendations were surprisingly accurate, especially around structure, query alignment, and citation potential. The “surfacing” section was the standout for me seeing what content AI engines are likely pulling from made the gaps very clear.
I used this product to check the LLM citability of my upcoming content piece, and it helped me assess how citable the content is. I’ll use the feedback to further refine and tweak the content. Great product.
@nitinvinay Thank you! Do share your score after you've integrated the feedback provided. :)
I have tried and it's actually helpful, because the way it judge the content on different parameters, gives transparency and a visible space for improvement.
I just tested this by pasting a long article I wrote last week, and it gave me a GEO score right away no sign‑up, super quick. It’s interesting to see where my writing stands before I publish. I’ll probably run my next blog through this first to catch things earlier. Nice to have something simple that gives instant feedback.
I tried a long format article that I pushed last week on Medium and scored 37/100. Great insight on my content strategy and structure. Will try this before posting my next blog too.
@pushpanjali_singh1 Thanks for trying!
works great to analyze and fix my post's content ai discoverability