FairHire
Catch risky job-post language before it becomes a lawsuit
2 followers
Catch risky job-post language before it becomes a lawsuit
2 followers
Paste a job posting. FairHire flags compliance risks, quoting the exact phrase and the requirement it may miss (pay transparency, EEO, age-coded language). Built for solo recruiters, with free anonymous audits and plans from $29/mo vs $14k/yr enterprise tools.
Free Options
Launch Team
Tines The single, secure environment for agents, apps, and automations.
Promoted
Hey Product Hunt, Gabriel here, solo founder of FairHire.
I recruited for 7 years at Amazon and Grupo Bimbo. We had the expensive tools, and compliance was still a Word doc SOP nobody kept current. When I left, I kept thinking about everyone who doesn't even get the expensive tools, the solo recruiters, small agencies, and founders writing their own postings, while 18 states plus DC pile on pay transparency laws with real penalties behind them.
So FairHire is deliberately simple. Paste a job post, and it shows you the risky phrases, quoting each one exactly, with the requirement it may not meet. It never says "illegal." It shows you what it sees and lets you decide. I think that honesty is the product.
One number that surprised even me. Of 480 live job postings we've audited in production, 321, or 66.9%, had at least one flag. 866 flags total. And the top issues aren't exotic. Missing key sections (231), no EEO statement (190), no salary range (181). Most job posts aren't recklessly wrong, they're just unmaintained. Like that Word doc.
You can try it anonymously, no signup, 3 audits a day. I'd genuinely love your feedback, especially from recruiters and founders. What would make you trust a tool like this enough to run every posting through it? What's missing? Brutal honesty welcome, I'm one person and I ship fast.