The gap between 1.5x and 100x isn't speed, it's trust!! AI agents generate code 100x faster than humans write it. But your team can't review it all. EasySpecs documents undocumented codebases and turns them into trustworthy specifications, so spec review becomes your new merge request review. Ground your agents in reality. Scale agentic development without babysitting. Document the foundation once. Review specs including Oracles and Rubrics and Ship code you actually verified.

Hey Product Hunt 👋

I'm Xesca, CTO turned founder. Before EasySpecs, I spent 15+ years being the person accountable for code I didn't personally write, across fintech, insurtech, and media.

That's the job now for every engineering leader: your agents ship code faster than anyone can read it, and you're still the one who answers for what breaks.

The problem

I kept hitting the same wall everywhere I looked:

Teams adopt AI coding agents, and PRs pile up faster than anyone can review them
Specs get written against a mental model of the codebase, not the actual codebase
Agents generate code against those specs
Things break silently, and nobody can trace why, because nobody documented what was actually there to begin with

Code review is dead. Spec review is where quality lives now. But spec review only works if the spec is grounded in reality, not guesswork.

What EasySpecs does

Two things, one workflow:

1. We document your codebase automatically

Even the undocumented, nobody-wants-to-touch-it kind. Our first real test was a pharmaceutical company's legacy Delphi system. If it works there, it works on whatever you're building.

2. We turn that understanding into specs your team and your agents can actually trust

Every spec comes paired with validators, so you know it matches the app before anyone codes against it.

Here's the part I'm most proud of: as you write a spec, the specs crafter suggests oracles and rubrics for it, concrete, checkable ways to verify the change actually did what the spec said.

Oracles — the "does this pass or fail" checks a machine can run
Rubrics — the judgment calls that need a human or an AI reviewer to score against clear criteria

You're not staring at a blank page trying to guess how to verify your own spec. The tool proposes it alongside the spec itself.

Built for more than developers

You don't need to be a developer to use it. Right now the only way to sanity-check a spec against reality is to go read the source yourself.

We built EasySpecs so product managers and team leads get that confidence without opening a single file.

Try it

Free to start — connect a repo, bring your own AI key, see what it finds
Workbench — €5/repo/month while launch pricing lasts (normally €10)
Factory — €150/month if you want us to run the AI side too, with credits to use on any repo

I'd genuinely love your feedback, especially if you throw a messy, undocumented codebase at it. That's the case we built for.

@xesca_i_am nice launch congrats for shipping 🙌

Can the approved specs be directly used by coding agents through MCP?

Didn't know that these sort of tools existed. Excited to see this in action going forward

Hey Product Hunt 👋

I'm Xesca, CTO turned founder. Before EasySpecs, I spent 15+ years being the person accountable for code I didn't personally write, across fintech, insurtech, and media.

That's the job now for every engineering leader: your agents ship code faster than anyone can read it, and you're still the one who answers for what breaks.

The problem

I kept hitting the same wall everywhere I looked:

Teams adopt AI coding agents, and PRs pile up faster than anyone can review them
Specs get written against a mental model of the codebase, not the actual codebase
Agents generate code against those specs
Things break silently, and nobody can trace why, because nobody documented what was actually there to begin with

Code review is dead. Spec review is where quality lives now. But spec review only works if the spec is grounded in reality, not guesswork.

What EasySpecs does

Two things, one workflow:

1. We document your codebase automatically

Even the undocumented, nobody-wants-to-touch-it kind. Our first real test was a pharmaceutical company's legacy Delphi system. If it works there, it works on whatever you're building.

2. We turn that understanding into specs your team and your agents can actually trust

Every spec comes paired with validators, so you know it matches the app before anyone codes against it.

Here's the part I'm most proud of: as you write a spec, the specs crafter suggests oracles and rubrics for it, concrete, checkable ways to verify the change actually did what the spec said.

Oracles — the "does this pass or fail" checks a machine can run
Rubrics — the judgment calls that need a human or an AI reviewer to score against clear criteria

You're not staring at a blank page trying to guess how to verify your own spec. The tool proposes it alongside the spec itself.

Built for more than developers

You don't need to be a developer to use it. Right now the only way to sanity-check a spec against reality is to go read the source yourself.

We built EasySpecs so product managers and team leads get that confidence without opening a single file.

Try it

Free to start — connect a repo, bring your own AI key, see what it finds
Workbench — €5/repo/month while launch pricing lasts (normally €10)
Factory — €150/month if you want us to run the AI side too, with credits to use on any repo

I'd genuinely love your feedback, especially if you throw a messy, undocumented codebase at it. That's the case we built for.

@xesca_i_am nice launch congrats for shipping 🙌

Can the approved specs be directly used by coding agents through MCP?

Didn't know that these sort of tools existed. Excited to see this in action going forward

easyspecs.ai

The spec review platform

The spec review platform

The problem

What EasySpecs does

Built for more than developers

Try it

The problem

What EasySpecs does

Built for more than developers

Try it