Decisi Tree breaks a problem into sub-problems, risks, and requirements — then flags what's missing before you decide. It compares solution paths with no fabricated scores, only real tradeoffs. For your top option, it runs a business feasibility check, a cognitive bias check, and a stakeholder map. Then it stress-tests the decision: pre-mortem, failure modes, mitigations, and an independent red-team review. A decision log tracks outcomes, so your next call learns from this one.
Meet BrunoSend a request, commit the collection. No account, no cloud.
Promoted
Maker
📌
Hey Product Hunt 👋 I'm Sana, solo builder of decisiTree.
I spent years in administration and management, including at a large industrial corporation with thousands of employees. I watched how decisions actually got made in that environment — prejudice, chaos, scattered thinking passed off as strategy. Imagine what it costs an organization that size to make one bad call, or to just never organize the thinking around a problem in the first place.
I come from a place where chaos is often the default operating mode. The need to organize thinking around problems and decisions isn't a nice-to-have there — it's urgent, in every setting I've worked in.
decisiTree is what I wished existed: break the problem down, surface what's missing, compare real tradeoffs (not a fabricated single score), stress-test the recommendation with an adversarial pass, and keep a log so the next decision learns from this one.
Would love your feedback — especially from anyone who's watched a decision get made by whoever was loudest in the room instead of by the actual evidence.