CybeDefend

Security that runs inside your AI coding agent

5.0•2 reviews•

532 followers

Security that runs inside your AI coding agent

5.0•2 reviews•

532 followers

•

•

CybeDefend secures the code your AI agent writes, from inside the agent. One command installs VibeDefend on Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, Codex and other agents. The agent then codes with your business rules, mined from your repo, and your security rules in its context. Each diff is scanned while the file is open, and a guard stops rm -rf, sudo or secret reads before they run. SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, CI/CD and container scanning are included. Free plan, no card.

CybeDefend Reviews

Name: CybeDefend
Rating: 5.0 (2 reviews)

The community submitted 2 reviews to tell us what they like about CybeDefend, what CybeDefend can do better, and more.

5.0

Based on 2 reviews

Review CybeDefend?

Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews

No reviews yetBe the first to leave a founder review for CybeDefend

Other Reviews (2)

•2 reviews

What's great

The integrations are what sold me. CybeDefend plugged straight into our CI/GitOps pipeline without me having to rework anything, so onboarding was quick and low-effort. Day to day it saves real time: scans are fast and findings come in with enough context that I'm not spending half an hour figuring out what a flag means before I can act on it. The AI side is genuinely useful, not just a checkbox. Cybe Analysis does a lot of the heavy lifting on the first pass (it triages and adds context so you're not starting from a raw list) and VibeDefend is a nice addition on top. Combined with the MCP integration, this is where it pays off: instead of treating every finding as a one-off, the relevant rules surface while the code is being written, so remediation gets industrialized and stays consistent across the team. Fewer things slip through, less repeated manual triage, and that's where the ROI shows up for us.

What needs improvement

Before CybeDefend we looked at snyk. What won me over is the MCP integration: the relevant rules surface while the code is being written, instead of every finding coming back as a one-off.

vs Alternatives

Honestly the main thing is the UI. There's been a clear effort put into it and it's improved, but it still takes too many clicks to get where you want, and navigating through findings feels heavier than it needs to be. When you handle remediation manually in the interface it ends up being time-consuming. Nothing blocking, but tightening the navigation and cutting the number of steps per action would make a real difference day to day.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

201 views20d ago

CybeDefend

Thanks Olivier! Fair point on the clicks, it goes straight to the product team. In the meantime, most of the remediation can run from the agent: through the MCP it pulls the repo's findings, fixes them in the IDE and updates their status, so the interface is only there to check the result.

Report

15d ago