Hey PH 👋 I built Connectory because I kept watching the same thing happen. Team adopts AI coding tools. Velocity goes up. Six months later: more incidents, a codebase nobody fully understands, and one senior dev burning out trying to review a tripled queue of AI-generated PRs that all look clean and aren't. The problem is not the AI tools. The problem is that every review tool on the market is stateless. It reads your diff and applies generic rules. It has no idea your team already built a retry utility 18 months ago. It has no idea your billing service has exactly one engineer who understands it. It doesn't know what your codebase is, what patterns your team uses, or what kind of project it even is. A FastAPI backend and an embedded firmware project are not the same thing. They should not get the same review. Connectory knows the difference. Three bots run on every PR: code review, AI slop detection (reinventions, copy-paste, band-aids), and security. All of them loaded with full context about your specific repo. Every blocked PR comes with a teaching conversation so your developers understand why, not just what. Every review makes the next one smarter. The org layer tracks every contributor, human and AI agent, by quality-adjusted output. Which agents are genuinely worth it. Which engineers are quietly declining. Where your knowledge is dangerously concentrated in one person. This started as an internal tool. It is now running on teams we have never met. That told us something. What I want to know: if you are using AI coding tools right now, what is the one thing that slipped through that you wish had not? Drop it below. PH only: first 3 months free, no card. DM me here. 👉 https://app.connectory.ai/

Connectory

Code review without knowing YOUR stack and goals is absurd !

Code review without knowing YOUR stack and goals is absurd !