Hey everyone 👋 I built Clearline after watching people pay for "guaranteed removal in 24 hours" and get a template refusal instead. The problem is almost never the wording of the request — it's that the request cites a ground the platform has no review queue for. Copyright and non-consensual imagery have staffed pipelines. "This post is unfair" doesn't. So the first step here is an assessment, not a quote: you send the URLs, you get back a per-URL breakdown of what has a removal path, what only has a suppression path, and what has neither. If it's all in the last bucket, we tell you that and there's no charge. The part I'd most like feedback on: how much detail people actually want in that first assessment. Right now it's fairly technical — legal ground per URL, expected timeline, escalation path. Too much? Not enough? Happy to answer anything about how takedowns actually work — including the parts that don't.

Clearline Reputation

Content removal and account recovery, with stated limits

Content removal and account recovery, with stated limits