Claren maps unstructured case documents, procedural stages, and statutory relationships into deterministic timelines for lawyers and law students.

Hey, I’m Manas, a law student and the creator of Claren (https://claren.app). The Problem: Legal practice is structurally trapped in Microsoft Word, fragmented PDF folders, and static text indexes. When tackling complex litigation, advocates and students pull all-nighters performing manual chronology extractions—mapping evidence to timelines by hand. Most legal tech startups throw unpredictable AI chatbots at this, but hallucinations are a catastrophic liability in a courtroom. The Solution: Claren treats a legal file as an interactive data structure. Instead of another chatbot or folder tree, it maps unstructured case documents, procedural stages, and statutory relationships into deterministic, spatial timelines. Think of it as an IDE for litigation. - For Advocates: It replaces passive document storage with a living evidence graph, binding your factual timeline directly to governing statutory provisions. - For Law Students: It strips away rote memorization by letting you visualize complex litigation tracks as responsive flowcharts. The platform is live and fully interactive right now. I built this to stop the 2 AM manual timeline nightmare, and I would love your brutal feedback on our UX layout, parsing precision, and ontology structure. What feature should an explainable operating system for litigation tackle next?

A timeline view is great for seeing the order of events, but lawyers often need to argue exceptions or deviations from the standard procedural path. Adding a side-by-side comparison mode where you can overlay two different cases would make spotting those deviations way easier. It would also be a huge help for law students trying to understand how similar fact patterns play out differently.

Claren: Deterministic case visuals

Visual Intelligence for Litigation Workflows.

Visual Intelligence for Litigation Workflows.