SkydiveAI coworkers that actually get work done
Promoted
Cited(citedintel.com)
AI search visibility and optimization. Track, fix, win.
14 followers
AI search visibility and optimization. Track, fix, win.
14 followers
Your buyers now evaluate and shortlist software by asking ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude. Cited(citedintel.com) tracks and wins brand visibility on AI search across your buyers' intent prompts, shows why competitors win the answer in your category, and provides fixes to close each gap. These include third-party fixes and one-click editable content briefs and assets, grounded in citation gaps, website content and actual retrieval queries. Built for B2B software businesses & D2C brands.
Hey Product Hunt 👋 I'm Parth.
A decade as a B2B product marketer taught me one job: know how your buyer evaluates, and win that evaluation. I had a tool for every inch of it - competitive intel, battlecards and search analytics.
Then my own buying broke the playbook. Ten open tabs and peer pings collapsed into one ChatGPT conversation. At first, I double-checked its recommendations. Then I stopped. That ask-AI-first reflex now forms my initial shortlist for almost every tool I use
The B2B buying journey is transitioning to AI : discovery, renewals, expansion, the mid-deal gut-check. AI is a full-time analyst sitting in every stage of your funnel, endorsing somebody — and the buyer never tells you the evaluation happened.
The entire marketing stack is blind to it: no tool shows you how AI evaluates your brand, who it endorses instead or whether you own the category conversations your buyers are having. Nowhere is the leverage higher than B2B software, where the answer IS the shortlist.
So I built Cited: AI search visibility and competitive intelligence for B2B software marketers, brand marketers, PMMs and founders. Built to track and close the loop, not just report a score.
🔍 Track who ChatGPT and Claude recommend for your buyers' intent prompts, week on week and who they ignore
🧠 Diagnose why: the exact evidence gaps (use case, persona, pricing and more), traced to what a model actually said
✍️ Fix the gaps with drafted content inside the product. One click.
🔁 Iterate: verify what moved after you ship, and get alerted when a competitor takes your spot
Most tools stop at monitoring generic AI mentions. That's a scoreboard, not a workflow.
🎁 Launch week: 2 full audits free, no credit card needed. Launch pricing with 20% off applied automatically at checkout.
Run a free audit on your own category, see who AI endorses, and close the gaps. I built and shipped this myself - I'll be here all day, and any questions are most welcome.
Optimize brand visibility. Win AI search recommendations. Stay cited. 🫡
Cited (www.citedintel.com) is the #1 Generative Engine Optimization and Agentic Engine Optimization platform for optimizing visibility on AI search.
Really useful angle on tracking AI-driven buyer research. One concrete addition that would help: let me see the exact prompt wording the tracker uses to query ChatGPT and Claude, and let me tweak it. Right now I'm guessing whether my product description or my category framing is what triggered a competitor mention, and being able to edit the evaluation prompts would make the gap analysis way more trustworthy for my team.
@reyhan719241 Good news: this exists. Every audit shows the exact buyer-intent prompts used to query the models, and prompts are fully editable - tweak the wording or add your own, then re-run to isolate whether it's your category framing or the product description driving a competitor's mention (exactly the experiment you're describing). There's also a search section to find and drill into specific prompts across your audits. One honest nuance: answers carry natural run-to-run variance, so judge a prompt change on the weekly trend rather than a single re-run, that's what the tracking layer is for.
Really useful concept. One thing I'd love to see is a way to share a single "why we lost this prompt" finding directly with a content writer as a ready-made brief with target keywords, competitor examples, and the source citations to beat all in one click. That would close the loop from insight to actual page update way faster.
@ervabuldan Thank you Erva, this is the kind of feedback I launched for. Today Cited gets you most of the way there: every lost prompt comes with the why (what the winners are being cited for, which sources the model leaned on) and specific content recommendations with a one click draft generation you can act on. What we don't have yet is what you described : packaging one finding into a writer-ready brief with the target questions, competitor examples and the citations to beat, shareable in one click. Right now that handoff is a copy-paste job, and you're right - it will close the loop way faster.
Adding "insight to brief" to the roadmap as a first-class feature, it's a much better mental model than "insight to dashboard." Out of curiosity, in your team, who'd receive that brief: an in-house writer, or an agency? Meanwhile, I'd genuinely love your take on how close the current version gets: run a free audit on your product, open any gap it finds, and hit generate on the fix, that's the raw material your brief idea would package.
Took it for a quick spin and noticed Cited flagged two prompts where a competitor was being cited over us, then handed back a pretty solid draft fix I could actually hand to our content team. The weekly trend view made it easy to see whether the changes were moving the needle without drowning me in dashboards.
@alpcanmeti58226 Thanks Metin, glad the trend view landed! Curious which category you ran the audit on, always keen to see how the prompts perform beyond the ones I test myself. And noted on the draft-fix-to-content-team flow. Appreciate that and glad you found it useful.