Paste your product page text and get a 0-100 score from 13 deterministic checks. See the buying facts shoppers still have to guess, or compare your page with a competitor to find facts they state that you do not. No AI, no signup, and your text stays in your browser. The free result shows your score, top gaps, and one full-check preview. A $9 one-time license unlocks every check, evidence, rewrite templates, and a 30-minute action plan for every page you grade.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for Buying-Facts Grader
Maker
📌
Hi Product Hunt. I build tools for ecommerce operators, and this one started from a pattern I kept seeing: most product pages fail because the buyer still has to guess. Not because the product is bad.
I wrote the checks down. Twelve of them, all rule-based: exact numbers for size and weight, materials, compatibility, who the product is NOT for, shipping timelines, return terms with day counts, FAQ coverage, and a penalty for vague praise like "premium quality."
A few decisions I want to be upfront about:
- It is not AI. It is a fixed set of pattern checks, and the page says so. For this job, deterministic rules beat a model — you get the same score for the same text every time.
- Your text never leaves your browser. The scoring runs entirely client-side.
- The free version shows your score and top 3 gaps. There is a $9 full report if you want every check with rewrite templates — no subscription, no account.
I would love feedback on two things: which checks feel wrong for your niche, and what buying facts you think are missing from the rubric.
Report
Scanned a few product pages and the size chart and shipping callouts were the first things it flagged, which is exactly what I would have missed. Nice that everything runs locally too.
Size chart and shipping are the two that cost the most sales without anyone noticing, so I am glad it caught them first. And yes, keeping it local was deliberate: your page text is your own, and a grader has no reason to send it anywhere.
If any check felt off while you scanned, tell me which one, that is the feedback I am after.
Report
Love the no-tracking approach and the rules-based checks feel way more trustworthy than another AI wrapper. One thing I'd love to see is a "competitor comparison" mode where I can paste two product pages and see which one scores higher, so I can spot what my page is missing relative to similar listings in the category.
Competitor comparison is the best idea I have heard today, and it fits how the tool already works. Scoring runs in your browser, so grading two pages side by side costs nothing extra. The part I would need to get right is what to show you. A score gap on its own would be noise. What you actually want is which checks the other page passes that yours fails, so the output is a list of facts to add, not a verdict. Putting it on the list.
Report
Maker
Quick follow-up: I shipped the comparison mode you suggested. The grader now shows which buying facts the other page states that yours does not, plus the facts both pages miss. You can try it under “Compare with a competitor.” Thanks for pushing the tool in a more useful direction.
Report
Scanned a few product pages through it and the return policy check flagged gaps I genuinely missed. Nice to have a no-frills tool that just points at the missing facts.
Return policy is the one people skip most, and often what a buyer checks last before deciding.
Glad it surfaced the gap. No-frills was the whole point: point at the missing fact, do not dress it up.
If a check ever feels too strict for your niche, I want to hear it.
Report
Ran my own product page through it and got a 64, which stung a little but the breakdown was actually useful. The shipping and return check flagged gaps I genuinely forgot to mention.
Scanned a few product pages and the size chart and shipping callouts were the first things it flagged, which is exactly what I would have missed. Nice that everything runs locally too.
@lkersna4
Size chart and shipping are the two that cost the most sales without anyone noticing, so I am glad it caught them first. And yes, keeping it local was deliberate: your page text is your own, and a grader has no reason to send it anywhere.
If any check felt off while you scanned, tell me which one, that is the feedback I am after.
Love the no-tracking approach and the rules-based checks feel way more trustworthy than another AI wrapper. One thing I'd love to see is a "competitor comparison" mode where I can paste two product pages and see which one scores higher, so I can spot what my page is missing relative to similar listings in the category.
@tansuorbacogbk
Competitor comparison is the best idea I have heard today, and it fits how the tool already works. Scoring runs in your browser, so grading two pages side by side costs nothing extra. The part I would need to get right is what to show you. A score gap on its own would be noise. What you actually want is which checks the other page passes that yours fails, so the output is a list of facts to add, not a verdict. Putting it on the list.
Quick follow-up: I shipped the comparison mode you suggested. The grader now shows which buying facts the other page states that yours does not, plus the facts both pages miss. You can try it under “Compare with a competitor.” Thanks for pushing the tool in a more useful direction.
Scanned a few product pages through it and the return policy check flagged gaps I genuinely missed. Nice to have a no-frills tool that just points at the missing facts.
@yarent23908
Return policy is the one people skip most, and often what a buyer checks last before deciding.
Glad it surfaced the gap. No-frills was the whole point: point at the missing fact, do not dress it up.
If a check ever feels too strict for your niche, I want to hear it.
Ran my own product page through it and got a 64, which stung a little but the breakdown was actually useful. The shipping and return check flagged gaps I genuinely forgot to mention.
@kran6vd7
Thanks for running it through, and for being upfront about the 64.
That is the number I would want people to see: not a verdict, but a map of where the gaps are.
The shipping and returns checks were the ones I went back and forth on the most, so I am curious.
Did the flag match what your buyers actually ask about, or did it feel too strict?
That is the kind of feedback I am hoping to get from this launch.