Axiomo

Hey everyone, I built Axiomo because AI code review tools kept solving the wrong problem for me. They all want to be a second developer on your PR. Catching lint issues, suggesting refactors, rewriting your code. That stuff is fine but it's not what makes PR review hard. What makes it hard is context. Who wrote this? Have they touched this area before? What are they actually trying to do? What's risky here and where should I focus? Axiomo generates what I call a Signal for every PR. It's a structured breakdown of contributor context, intent, risk drivers, CI evidence, and the specific files you should pay attention to. It doesn't tell you what to change. It tells you where to look and why. I've been reviewing PRs for a long time across teams of different sizes and the pattern is always the same. You open a big diff, you skim, you approve, and you hope nothing breaks. I wanted something that actually helped me review instead of just adding more noise to the PR. Would love to hear what your review process looks like and what part of it feels broken to you.