AWS

AWS offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud.

5.0•304 reviews•

3.4K followers

AWS offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud.

5.0•304 reviews•

3.4K followers

Visit website

Databases and backend frameworks

•

Cloud Computing Platforms

Alexa for Business is a new service that enables businesses and organizations to bring Alexa into the workplace at scale.

AWS Reviews

The community submitted 304 reviews to tell us what they like about AWS, what AWS can do better, and more.

5.0

Based on 304 reviews

Review AWS?

Reviewers mostly see AWS as dependable infrastructure: reliable, scalable, secure, and broad enough to run everything from email pipelines and AI workloads to storage, containers, and real-time apps. Founders behind Agentplace.io, Ada.im, and Naoma AI Demo Agent especially praise Bedrock, strong scaling under spiky traffic, and enterprise credibility. The main tension is usability: one user wants better UX outside CLI/CDK, and some founders say the console, pricing, and onboarding to larger services can feel overwhelming.

+304

Summarized with AI

Pros

reliable cloud services (35)

scalable infrastructure (33)

extensive service offerings (7)

AWS Lambda (5)

AWS EC2 (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (303)

Other Reviews (1)

used AWS to build FetchSandbox

•8 reviews

What's great

FetchSandbox runs entirely on AWS. Every sandbox, every spec's engine, and every reproduce→prove run — where we spin up two containers to prove a bug is real, then tear them down seconds later — happens here. As a solo founder I started on Lightsail for dead-simple, predictable hosting, and the best part is knowing the rest of AWS is right there when I need to scale, without a migration. It's the boring-in-the-best-way foundation: reliable enough that I think about my product, not my servers.

What needs improvement

AWS's breadth is also its friction. The console and pricing can be overwhelming, and the jump from Lightsail's simplicity to the full platform feels more like a cliff than a ramp — I'd love a smoother way to grow into the bigger services without re-architecting. More predictable cost visibility for small teams would help too. But the reliability makes the learning curve worth it.

vs Alternatives

FetchSandbox runs on AWS. Every sandbox, every spec's engine, and every reproduce→prove run lives here — so when an agent fires a workflow and we spin up two containers to prove a bug is real, that happens on AWS in seconds and tears down clean. It's the boring-in-the-best-way foundation: reliable enough that we get to think about the product instead of the servers.

Report

30 views4mo ago

used AWS to build AXL

•4 reviews

We chose AWS for its mature infrastructure, broad range of managed services and flexibility as AXL grows. It gives us the foundation to run our platform while keeping our team focused on building useful sales and marketing tools instead of managing servers.

Alternatives Considered

Report

3 views7d ago

used AWS to build Alsona

•8 reviews

It gives us the front end and the API routes in one framework, so we can ship a full feature without bouncing between codebases. It also runs natively on Vercel, which made v0 and preview deploys plug right in with zero setup.

Alternatives Considered

Report

2 views4d ago