What if you could bring your buyers into the chat where you re already working, whether you re shaping a message, a strategy, or a value prop, right inside ChatGPT or Claude?
That s what we spent the last month on. After our last launch, the thing people kept telling us was that most of their work already happens inside their agent, and leaving it to go test something in Articos broke the flow. Hard to argue with that.
So you can do A/B testing without doing A/B testing right?
@etienne_lescot1 Yeah :)
@etienne_lescot1 yes pretty much 😄 you get the read without needing the traffic or the wait. Not a replacement for a real test once you are live, but a gut-check on which way to go before you spend on it. You can signup for for free and can run 2 different test without any subscription. https://www.articos.com/
Can it also "look" at graphic illustrations?
@sellac for a landing page it will look to some extend along with the messaging. You should run a landing page test and see how it goes. You can run 2 test for free without any subscription https://www.articos.com/
@owais_khan22 alright, will explore. Thanks
@sellac perfect, let us know how it goes.
Congrats on Articos second launch @owais_khan22 🎉
The “test first, then ship” idea should be a rule for every landing page and ad campaign! Which use case is most popular so far with MCP users - headlines, ad comparisons, or finding the ICP?
@kate_ramakaieva Thanks Kate for your support!
we have seen MCP user test messaging alot because they are usually working inside Claude to come up with messaging. Now they just simulate their audience there and get feedback.
@kate_ramakaieva thx for supporting us today :)
about your question: mostly headlines and ad copy so far, by a lot. Thats where the spend and the risk sit, so people want to be sure before it’s live.
Just one question how does Articos measure it's 86 % of human accuracy?
@jitendra_bhatt Hi great ques - we have benchmarked against studies from NNg and Baymard - you can read more here: https://www.articos.com/science-and-methodology
@jitendra_bhatt Valid question. We compared our articos research against published Baymard and Nielsen Norman research, same questions, and the findings matched ~86% of the time. Full methodology’s here if you want to dig in: https://www.articos.com/science-and-methodology
Would this work for a SaaS product that is still refining its ideal customer profile?
@amybradley Yeah, that’s a good fit actually. You can run a few different buyer profiles and see which one responds to your messaging, so it helps you narrow the ICP instead of guessing at it. Happy to show you, it’s at articos.com if you want to try it. (free trial with 2 studies, no credit card)
Congrats on the launch @owais_khan22
One use case I find particularly interesting is understanding Product Hunt founders.
For example, I did the following comperasion: first-time indie hackers, bootstrapped founders and funded startups, to understand how their goals and expectations.
Pretty solid output.
Are you planning any Slack integrations?
@byalexai Thanks Alex! Fan and fair critic since the last launch, appreciate that. And last time you asked for MCP, now Slack, MCP’s done, so let’s see what we can do about this one too. 😄 That founder comparison’s a sharp one, hadn’t thought of framing it that way.
@owais_khan22 can't wait to see what's next
@byalexai Thanks for your support Alex! Yes Slack is something we need to add as a integration.
Can Articos help teams test pricing strategies and understand how different customer segments might react to different price points?
@carter_garcia Yeah. Run user interview, set your context and segments, test a few price points, and see how each reacts, who pushes back, who doesn’t. Same price usually lands very differently across segments, which is the part worth looking at.