Articos helps SaaS teams, agencies, and founders test messaging, positioning, and landing pages against simulated personas matched to your ICP. Real audience signal in under 30 minutes. Peer-reviewed at 86% human accuracy vs Baymard and Nielsen Norman.
I am Shaheer, founder of Articos. I spent years in product at Cloudways (acquired for $350M) and at DigitalOcean. Every time we planned a launch, positioning, or new angle, the same thing happened: real audience input cost thousands of dollars and took 4 to 8 weeks, sometimes more. So teams shipped on gut after a Slack debate.
Articos helps SaaS teams, agencies, and founders launch with confidence, not gut. Get structured user insights and feedback in under 30 minutes at a fraction of cost
Here's how it works:
Pick your research type (message testing, landing page testing, user interview, A/B test)
Share what you're testing, where it will run, and who it's for
Get findings from simulated personas matched to your ICP
Why teams use Articos:
Peer-reviewed methodology across 46 studies in 9 industries, 86% accurate against Baymard and Nielsen Norman
7.5x more accurate than ChatGPT or Claude for the same research task
Every finding traces back to specific persona reasoning
White-label reports for agencies presenting to clients
Used by PMMs, growth teams, agencies, and founders at Instacart, HiJiffy, and DealHub, plus hundreds of teams shipping without a research budget.
We just shipped live calls with personas. You can now talk to your simulated audience in real time.
For Product Hunt makers: PH40 gets you 40% off Starter and Pro monthly plans, launch week only. Or try free with 2 researches, no card required.
We'd love your honest feedback. What decision would you test first?
Huge thanks to our hunter Chris Messina for hunting us today. — Shaheer
Report
@shaheergadit Curious about the metric how exactly are you quantifying that Articos is 7.5x more accurate than ChatGPT or Claude for research tasks? What benchmark or ground truth is being used to measure that?
The 7.5× is based on theme-recovery F1. Articos scored 0.619 F1 vs. 0.082 for bare GPT, using published findings from Baymard, Nielsen Norman Group, and peer-reviewed research as the ground truth. Themes were matched semantically against those expert findings and scored on precision + recall, with the full system recovering 86.3% of reference themes at 49.2% precision.
you can read more about this on our /science-and-methodology page on website
Seems like a really interesting use case for CRO, especially as a pre-validation layer before putting real traffic behind an A/B test. Could save a lot of testing cycles. Congrats Shaheer and team!
Articos
Hey Product Hunt
I am Shaheer, founder of Articos. I spent years in product at Cloudways (acquired for $350M) and at DigitalOcean. Every time we planned a launch, positioning, or new angle, the same thing happened: real audience input cost thousands of dollars and took 4 to 8 weeks, sometimes more. So teams shipped on gut after a Slack debate.
Articos helps SaaS teams, agencies, and founders launch with confidence, not gut. Get structured user insights and feedback in under 30 minutes at a fraction of cost
Here's how it works:
Pick your research type (message testing, landing page testing, user interview, A/B test)
Share what you're testing, where it will run, and who it's for
Get findings from simulated personas matched to your ICP
Why teams use Articos:
Peer-reviewed methodology across 46 studies in 9 industries, 86% accurate against Baymard and Nielsen Norman
7.5x more accurate than ChatGPT or Claude for the same research task
Every finding traces back to specific persona reasoning
White-label reports for agencies presenting to clients
Used by PMMs, growth teams, agencies, and founders at Instacart, HiJiffy, and DealHub, plus hundreds of teams shipping without a research budget.
We just shipped live calls with personas. You can now talk to your simulated audience in real time.
For Product Hunt makers: PH40 gets you 40% off Starter and Pro monthly plans, launch week only. Or try free with 2 researches, no card required.
We'd love your honest feedback. What decision would you test first?
Huge thanks to our hunter Chris Messina for hunting us today.
— Shaheer
Articos
@tehreem_fatima5 Hi - Tehreem
The 7.5× is based on theme-recovery F1. Articos scored 0.619 F1 vs. 0.082 for bare GPT, using published findings from Baymard, Nielsen Norman Group, and peer-reviewed research as the ground truth. Themes were matched semantically against those expert findings and scored on precision + recall, with the full system recovering 86.3% of reference themes at 49.2% precision.
you can read more about this on our /science-and-methodology page on website
Cloudways by DigitalOcean