For founders, creators and freelanvers the zero-to-one phase is crucial. This is where you get to start strong or on the wrong foot. Clarifying goals, capturing and clarifying those early ideas helps teams embark in the right direction and minimise resource wastage. And yet, that crucial early ‘before the startup/project/endeavour’ phase is often neglected with most solutions being offered for later stages of a project’s lifecycle. Allinop was built with the intent to increase the signal/noise founders experience during those early days. It offers private workspaces (Projects), which are private and hidden from the external world of search engines and visible only to the select members invited by the Project owner. Each Project is a deliberately minimalistic interface, equipped with a small number of stupid good and easy tools: - Forum: a discussion board for members to capture ideas - Docs: for collaborative delving into deeper areas of the project - Task manager: minimalistic tools for tracking down iobs and marking them complete as you go along - Links: a lightweight bookmarking tool housed within your project For enhanved privacy, Allinop has no members directory. To start collaborating you must first connect with others. Then you can start adding you connections tonyour projects. Bit how can you make connections without a directory? Well, how can tou have contact number on your phone without a phonebook? Likewise, you exchange profile urls with your trusted circle with whom you want to transfer your collaboration onto Allinop. Then you can send conenct requests and statt working together. While this sounds cumbersome, it abides with our philosophybof reducing noise in favour of signal and this reducing the risk of getting spammed by removing the members directory altogether. At Allinop we’ve burned the phonebook! We trust our isers to find each other out when it comes to connecting with their most trusted collaborators. Our philosophy was alrgely inspired by Daniel Kanherman’s system 1 and system 2 thinking as documented in his book Think Fast and Slow. Sustem 1 is our inherent wuickfire thinking wjereas system 2 is the more analytical. This we built privates workspaves within which quickfire sparks (forum) and more detailed deliberate planning (docs) coexist side by side. Over time we also added the ‘Tasks’ , ‘Links’ tools hoping to facilitate ideation and planning progress. Enough from me though, I really want to know what you guys think! I know there are many things I want to refine, so I’n sure there’s lots of scope for feedback :)

Allinop

Zero-to-One collaboration platform with stupid good tools

Zero-to-One collaboration platform with stupid good tools