AIssential
An analyst on your open AI decisions.
2 followers
An analyst on your open AI decisions.
2 followers
AI where it pays. Your expertise where it counts.
AI was supposed to save time. It writes fast, and you re-read everything behind it: the quote, the tender response, the report, and every piece that leads to them, because nobody knows where its mistake will hide. What that re-read catches, nobody counts.
Free
Launch Team / Built With
Dropbox SignSimple, secure eSignatures for the way your team works.
Promoted
Hey Product Hunters!
I built AIssential after spending too many hours
every week trying to stay up with AI across arXiv,
newsletters, YouTube, blogs, and podcasts.
The insight: curation isn't about fewer sources — it's
about matching sources to your specific role and focus.
An AI engineer and an AI policy researcher should see
completely different feeds from the same 450 sources.
Happy to answer any questions about how the enrichment and
the filtering work or the tech behind it.
Update, Aug 2026 — the pitch above is a year old and no longer describes the product.
AIssential started as a filtered feed: 450 sources, one feed per role. It worked, and it didn't matter — a better feed is still something you have to read and turn into a call yourself.
So the product moved. Counsel takes the decisions you've actually got open and argues a position on each one, quoting real published work verbatim rather than improvising. The mechanism is the whole thing: a chatbot writes first and cites later; this reads first and writes only what it can quote.
Public verdicts are readable without an account if you'd rather judge the goods before signing up.
Update, Aug 2026 — the pitch above is a year old and no longer describes the product.
AIssential started as a filtered feed: 450 sources, one feed per role. It worked, and it didn't matter — a better feed is still something you have to read and turn into a call yourself.
So the product moved. Counsel takes the decisions you've actually got open and argues a position on each one, quoting real published work verbatim rather than improvising. The mechanism is the whole thing: a chatbot writes first and cites later; this reads first and writes only what it can quote.
Public verdicts are readable without an account if you'd rather judge the goods before signing up.