Hi Product Hunt — I built AILegal after watching an LLM confidently cite a law that doesn't exist (18 U.S.C. § 301) and quote a UK section that says something else entirely (Consumer Credit Act 1974 s. 157). So the rule here is simple: never state a legal fact we haven't verified against the official source. Each of the 53 norms in our corpus carries a deeplink to the official text and a content hash; a scheduled job re-checks every source, and if anything can't be confirmed, the assistant stops naming deadlines and article numbers and says why. It's aimed at people who can't afford a lawyer: the situation breakdown is free; documents are paid (crypto / Telegram Stars). Content is RU/EN for now. What I'd love from this community: take any norm on ailegal.legal, compare it with the official text, and try to make it state something the source doesn't. That's the feedback that actually improves it.

AILegal

Legal answers that cite the source

Legal answers that cite the source