1752vc Pitch Deck Analyzer
Investors decide in seconds. Know what they'll say.
24 followers
Investors decide in seconds. Know what they'll say.
24 followers
The Pitch Deck Analyzer gives you investor-grade feedback in minutes — trained on 25,000+ real decks and investor decisions. Upload your deck and get a slide-by-slide fundability breakdown, scored across the 3,000+ attributes. Know exactly where investors lose conviction before you ever hit send. Built by 1752vc, a leading venture capital firm and accelerator, which evaluates 4,000+ startups a year.
Hey Product Hunt 👋
I’m Taissa Maleh from 1752vc — a VC firm and accelerator that evaluates 4,000+ startups a year, which means we’ve seen some decks. The good, the bad, and every kind of “hockey stick” chart you can imagine!
So we built the thing we always wished we could hand founders: a Pitch Deck Analyzer that tells you what investors are really thinking — before you ever hit send. Think of it as a mind reader for the room while they flip through your slides.
We’re almost ready to launch. Follow the page and you’ll be the first to know when we go live!
In the meantime, I’m curious: what’s the one part of your pitch deck you’re least sure about?
We’ll be reading every reply.
@tmaleh_ the market size slide. everyone puts a TAM/SAM/SOM breakdown but investors can tell in seconds if you actually understand your market or just pulled numbers from a report. that's the one i'd want the most honest feedback on.
@riya_pariyar I love the market size slide because you're absolutely right - most founders get this horribly wrong, copying and pasting from a report they saw (and don't even source it). The analyzer specifically flags when your market sizing logic has no connective tissue: when the numbers are there but the path from TAM to your actual addressable doesn't exist. That's the kind of information that actually moves the needle when fundraising.
ApyHub
@tmaleh_ This sounds like a really useful tool for founders. Getting honest feedback on a pitch deck before sending it to investors can save so much time and uncertainty.
I especially like the idea of understanding what investors are actually thinking as they go through each slide. Looking forward to seeing the full launch🎉
@gabriella_anjani Thank you! That's exactly the gap we're closing - founders shouldn't have to guess what investors are thinking. Building a scalable startup is hard; this is something we can "control" and solve for. You'll notice the slide-by-slide feedback is not generic - it will sometimes force you to revisit strategy.
Following. It's not one slide for me, it's the whole thing. The hard part is fitting what my app actually is, how it works, and what makes it different from competitors into a deck without drowning people in slides or packing every slide too full. I could stand on a soapbox and rattle off every feature and why each one sets us apart, but that's not how this game is played. And I have to get all of it across without giving away the secret sauce. Keeping it tight, keeping their attention, and still landing the difference is the piece I struggle with most. Does the analyzer flag when a deck is overloaded, or when it's holding back too much to tell the story?
@worksource Totally get this - and this is exactly what we are building for. The analyzer flags both directions: it calls out slides that are overloaded (too many features/metrics competing for attention) and ones that are holding back so much the story doesn’t land. At pre-seed especially, it’s tuned to protect your through-line—problem, why-you, one proof point—so you can keep the secret sauce and still make the difference obvious. Try it out and tell us what worked and what didn’t—that kind of feedback is gold for us right now.
Caught what I couldn't see in my own deck
Used The Pitch Deck Analyzer on my pre-seed deck, and it did something I didn't expect: it cross-checked my own claims against each other and caught an inconsistency I'd missed — a stat that didn't match what I'd already verified elsewhere in my own materials. That's a much harder problem than generic design feedback, and it's the kind of thing that actually costs you credibility in a real meeting.
Beyond that, it forced honesty on the claims I hadn't stress-tested yet — projections and metrics that sounded fine to me but had no real assumptions behind them. It didn't just say "this is weak," it told me exactly what would make each one defensible.
The critical-vs-quick-wins split was also genuinely useful for triage.
Net result: fewer things in my deck I couldn't defend out loud. That's the actual bar for this kind of tool, and it cleared it.
@nzouat The internal consistency check is one of the things we're most proud of. Founders can fact-check against their sources, but it's hard to catch when two claims in the same deck contradict each other - that's an overlooked but critical tell. It quietly diminishes a founder's credibility and signals they can't juggle multiple things without dropping the ball.
This is especially timely for us as we’re currently fundraising. One thing I’d love the analyzer to assess is whether the raise amount, use of funds, runway, and promised milestones actually form a credible path to the next round. Investors don’t evaluate those points in isolation and they want to see whether the hiring plan, GTM strategy, projections, and funding ask all connect. Does the analyzer stress-test that overall financing logic as well? Looking forward to trying it! 🚀
Migma AI
Cool idea! Will def use it for our next round!
@liam007 Love it! We’re also quietly building a full fundraising module that should make your next raise a lot smoother — stay tuned, I think you’ll find it seriously useful.