Framer AI AgentsDesign and publish professional sites with AI
Promoted
Maker
📌
Hey Product Hunt 👋 I’m Denis, the maker of Wield.
I built Wield after repeatedly running into the same problem with AI coding agents: they could generate good code, but complex work still lost context between planning, implementation, review and testing. I spent too much time repeating instructions, correcting incomplete handoffs, and checking whether “finished” work was actually ready to ship.
Wield turns that repeated guidance into a structured engineering system for Codex & Claude Code. It includes 26 focused skills, 13 specialized agents, shared engineering rules and multi agent workflows for planning, building, debugging, reviewing, testing, and shipping software.
The biggest lesson while building Wield was that adding more agents isn’t enough. Each agent needs a deliberately scoped role, the right context, and a clear definition of done. That became the foundation of the product: one request comes in, specialists handle each stage, and verification closes the loop.
For the Product Hunt community, I’m offering 80% off with code PH80OFF.
I’d love your feedback, especially on where your current AI coding workflow breaks down or still requires too much supervision.
Thanks for checking out Wield! 🛠️
Report
Love how the agents are split into specific roles rather than one mega bot. One thing I'd love to see is a way to share my custom workflow configurations with teammates or fork someone else's setup, so teams can standardize how they use Wield across a codebase.
Thanks, really appreciate this suggestion! You can already do a repo-based version of this today by committing your project-level .wield.json and any custom skills or workflows alongside the code. You can also share .wield/memory.md if you want the team to carry the same project decisions and conventions across sessions.
What we don’t have yet is a proper one click experience for publishing, discovering, and forking someone else’s setup. I am working on a proper Teams & Enterprise offering, and I will definitely take this into consideration.
Would you find it more useful to share a complete setup or individual workflows?
Hey Product Hunt 👋 I’m Denis, the maker of Wield.
I built Wield after repeatedly running into the same problem with AI coding agents: they could generate good code, but complex work still lost context between planning, implementation, review and testing. I spent too much time repeating instructions, correcting incomplete handoffs, and checking whether “finished” work was actually ready to ship.
Wield turns that repeated guidance into a structured engineering system for Codex & Claude Code. It includes 26 focused skills, 13 specialized agents, shared engineering rules and multi agent workflows for planning, building, debugging, reviewing, testing, and shipping software.
The biggest lesson while building Wield was that adding more agents isn’t enough. Each agent needs a deliberately scoped role, the right context, and a clear definition of done.
That became the foundation of the product: one request comes in, specialists handle each stage, and verification closes the loop.
For the Product Hunt community, I’m offering 80% off with code PH80OFF.
I’d love your feedback, especially on where your current AI coding workflow breaks down or still requires too much supervision.
Thanks for checking out Wield! 🛠️
Love how the agents are split into specific roles rather than one mega bot. One thing I'd love to see is a way to share my custom workflow configurations with teammates or fork someone else's setup, so teams can standardize how they use Wield across a codebase.
@semanur280716
Thanks, really appreciate this suggestion! You can already do a repo-based version of this today by committing your project-level .wield.json and any custom skills or workflows alongside the code. You can also share .wield/memory.md if you want the team to carry the same project decisions and conventions across sessions.
What we don’t have yet is a proper one click experience for publishing, discovering, and forking someone else’s setup. I am working on a proper Teams & Enterprise offering, and I will definitely take this into consideration.
Would you find it more useful to share a complete setup or individual workflows?